I know you can set up dual core processors to run 2 different instances of f@h.
Just upgraded from a single core 1.8 GHz to a dual 3.0 GHz.
What's the difference between setting up 2 instances of the regular client, or running the SMP client?
Thanks
I know you can set up dual core processors to run 2 different instances of f@h.
Just upgraded from a single core 1.8 GHz to a dual 3.0 GHz.
What's the difference between setting up 2 instances of the regular client, or running the SMP client?
Thanks
Stanford does say about the SMP client :ThanksWe strongly suggest people run this client on 4-core boxes. While it will run on 2-core boxes, we have noticed some potential problems (we are looking into these issues now).
I haven't run any F@H stuff for a while but the SMP client has always been problematic on dual core/Hyperthreaded CPUs.
EDIT: Not sure if you have a Dual core or a Single core with Hyperthreading, but if its the Single core then except the hyperthreaded core to be much slower at folding than your real core.
If you have a dual core CPU w/ hyperthreading you should have 4 separate boxes in the task manager performance section if I remember right.
http://www.piriform.com/speccy
What does speccy say for your "Cores", "Threads", and the "Specification" info?
(Yay 2 speccy posts in 2 days!)
Lots of cool features, although it does read one of my internal hdds running at over 100C.
Hah, 100C has to be wrong. Maybe try flipping to F and back to C.
So a 3ghz w/HT, you should definitely run the single core client, you can run 2 instances. The 2nd one will be much slower though.
got it, thanks
Bookmarks