Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

[Ari Silverstein]

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC), Mr.B1ack wrote:

> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
>>>
>>> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)
>>
>> Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian.
>
> Huh? Is this a ninja-based charity?
>
> *HAHAHAHAHAHA*
>
>> I grow for other people, not myself..
>
> Very kind.
>
>> yeah I smoke the weed...
>
> Very noticeable.
>
>> so ****ing
>> what? I'm wondering why I bothered to register for this ****hole.
>
> Register? WTF are you talking about, register? This is Usenet you
> brain dead ganja cretin.

I took his money. I admit it. In come this stoked out assclown (SOAC)
with a blunt hanging from his lips.

AS: "That will be two hundred dollars"
SOAC: "For what?"
AS: "Registration to Usenet"
SOAC: "Take cash?"
AS: <grin> "Only".
SOAC: "What do I get?"
AS: "The right to be pummeled for being a Stoked Out AssClown who
hasn't a clue about anonymity and privacy."
SOAC: "Kewl." <rips cash out>
AS: "And a pound of Blue Dream bud."
SOAC: "WTF?"
AS: "You want a thorough pounding or not?"
SOAC: "Kewl." <tosses a kilo on the table>
--
Passwords, people, they are not just for game shows. If you refuse to
make the effort to remember a few long, diverse passwords, then don't
scream at me when your FICO is 496 and your bank accounts are zeroed
out.

[RMCG]

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:04:36 -0400, Ari Silverstein wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC), Mr.B1ack wrote:
>
>> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
>>>>
>>>> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)
>>>
>>> Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian.
>>
>> Huh? Is this a ninja-based charity?
>>
>> *HAHAHAHAHAHA*
>>
>>> I grow for other people, not myself..
>>
>> Very kind.
>>
>>> yeah I smoke the weed...
>>
>> Very noticeable.
>>
>>> so ****ing
>>> what? I'm wondering why I bothered to register for this ****hole.
>>
>> Register? WTF are you talking about, register? This is Usenet you
>> brain dead ganja cretin.
>
> I took his money. I admit it. In come this stoked out assclown (SOAC)
> with a blunt hanging from his lips.
>
> AS: "That will be two hundred dollars"
> SOAC: "For what?"
> AS: "Registration to Usenet"
> SOAC: "Take cash?"
> AS: <grin> "Only".
> SOAC: "What do I get?"
> AS: "The right to be pummeled for being a Stoked Out AssClown who
> hasn't a clue about anonymity and privacy."
> SOAC: "Kewl." <rips cash out>
> AS: "And a pound of Blue Dream bud."
> SOAC: "WTF?"
> AS: "You want a thorough pounding or not?"
> SOAC: "Kewl." <tosses a kilo on the table>

You are an idiot as I don't grow weed illegally. I am 100% legal in my
state.

[Ari Silverstein]

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:26:46 -0400, RMCG wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:04:36 -0400, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC), Mr.B1ack wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
>>>>>
>>>>> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian.
>>>
>>> Huh? Is this a ninja-based charity?
>>>
>>> *HAHAHAHAHAHA*
>>>
>>>> I grow for other people, not myself..
>>>
>>> Very kind.
>>>
>>>> yeah I smoke the weed...
>>>
>>> Very noticeable.
>>>
>>>> so ****ing
>>>> what? I'm wondering why I bothered to register for this ****hole.
>>>
>>> Register? WTF are you talking about, register? This is Usenet you
>>> brain dead ganja cretin.
>>
>> I took his money. I admit it. In come this stoked out assclown (SOAC)
>> with a blunt hanging from his lips.
>>
>> AS: "That will be two hundred dollars"
>> SOAC: "For what?"
>> AS: "Registration to Usenet"
>> SOAC: "Take cash?"
>> AS: <grin> "Only".
>> SOAC: "What do I get?"
>> AS: "The right to be pummeled for being a Stoked Out AssClown who
>> hasn't a clue about anonymity and privacy."
>> SOAC: "Kewl." <rips cash out>
>> AS: "And a pound of Blue Dream bud."
>> SOAC: "WTF?"
>> AS: "You want a thorough pounding or not?"
>> SOAC: "Kewl." <tosses a kilo on the table>
>
> You are an idiot as I don't grow weed illegally. I am 100% legal in my
> state.

No one said you were illegal. Paranoid a bit much, Assclown?

Of course, you can tell that to the Federal Prosecutor after the DEA
comes slashing through your front door, horribly mangling your tits,
and wreaking havoc on your life as you play Bendover Bobby to the
Leavenworth bitches squealing "I'm legal, I'm legal"!

*LOL*

Tell 'em you are Sam Caldwell's protégé. Yeah, that'll work. /lol/
--
http://www.dwacon.com/images/melgibson.jpg

[RMCG]

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:34:51 -0400, Ari Silverstein wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:26:46 -0400, RMCG wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:04:36 -0400, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC), Mr.B1ack wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian.
>>>>
>>>> Huh? Is this a ninja-based charity?
>>>>
>>>> *HAHAHAHAHAHA*
>>>>
>>>>> I grow for other people, not myself..
>>>>
>>>> Very kind.
>>>>
>>>>> yeah I smoke the weed...
>>>>
>>>> Very noticeable.
>>>>
>>>>> so ****ing
>>>>> what? I'm wondering why I bothered to register for this ****hole.
>>>>
>>>> Register? WTF are you talking about, register? This is Usenet you
>>>> brain dead ganja cretin.
>>>
>>> I took his money. I admit it. In come this stoked out assclown (SOAC)
>>> with a blunt hanging from his lips.
>>>
>>> AS: "That will be two hundred dollars"
>>> SOAC: "For what?"
>>> AS: "Registration to Usenet"
>>> SOAC: "Take cash?"
>>> AS: <grin> "Only".
>>> SOAC: "What do I get?"
>>> AS: "The right to be pummeled for being a Stoked Out AssClown who
>>> hasn't a clue about anonymity and privacy."
>>> SOAC: "Kewl." <rips cash out>
>>> AS: "And a pound of Blue Dream bud."
>>> SOAC: "WTF?"
>>> AS: "You want a thorough pounding or not?"
>>> SOAC: "Kewl." <tosses a kilo on the table>
>>
>> You are an idiot as I don't grow weed illegally. I am 100% legal in my
>> state.
>
> No one said you were illegal. Paranoid a bit much, Assclown?
>
> Of course, you can tell that to the Federal Prosecutor after the DEA
> comes slashing through your front door, horribly mangling your tits,
> and wreaking havoc on your life as you play Bendover Bobby to the
> Leavenworth bitches squealing "I'm legal, I'm legal"!
>
> *LOL*
>
> Tell 'em you are Sam Caldwell's protégé. Yeah, that'll work. /lol/

The Feds leave us alone, shithead, you don't know what you are farting
on about. Who's Caldwell?

[Ari Silverstein]

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:03:13 -0400, RMCG wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:34:51 -0400, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:26:46 -0400, RMCG wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:04:36 -0400, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC), Mr.B1ack wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian.
>>>>>
>>>>> Huh? Is this a ninja-based charity?
>>>>>
>>>>> *HAHAHAHAHAHA*
>>>>>
>>>>>> I grow for other people, not myself..
>>>>>
>>>>> Very kind.
>>>>>
>>>>>> yeah I smoke the weed...
>>>>>
>>>>> Very noticeable.
>>>>>
>>>>>> so ****ing
>>>>>> what? I'm wondering why I bothered to register for this ****hole.
>>>>>
>>>>> Register? WTF are you talking about, register? This is Usenet you
>>>>> brain dead ganja cretin.
>>>>
>>>> I took his money. I admit it. In come this stoked out assclown (SOAC)
>>>> with a blunt hanging from his lips.
>>>>
>>>> AS: "That will be two hundred dollars"
>>>> SOAC: "For what?"
>>>> AS: "Registration to Usenet"
>>>> SOAC: "Take cash?"
>>>> AS: <grin> "Only".
>>>> SOAC: "What do I get?"
>>>> AS: "The right to be pummeled for being a Stoked Out AssClown who
>>>> hasn't a clue about anonymity and privacy."
>>>> SOAC: "Kewl." <rips cash out>
>>>> AS: "And a pound of Blue Dream bud."
>>>> SOAC: "WTF?"
>>>> AS: "You want a thorough pounding or not?"
>>>> SOAC: "Kewl." <tosses a kilo on the table>
>>>
>>> You are an idiot as I don't grow weed illegally. I am 100% legal in my
>>> state.
>>
>> No one said you were illegal. Paranoid a bit much, Assclown?
>>
>> Of course, you can tell that to the Federal Prosecutor after the DEA
>> comes slashing through your front door, horribly mangling your tits,
>> and wreaking havoc on your life as you play Bendover Bobby to the
>> Leavenworth bitches squealing "I'm legal, I'm legal"!
>>
>> *LOL*
>>
>> Tell 'em you are Sam Caldwell's protégé. Yeah, that'll work. /lol/
>
> The Feds leave us alone, shithead, you don't know what you are farting
> on about.

http://www.justice.gov/dea/pubs/pressrel/pr961106.htm

> Who's Caldwell?

It's over for you. You know that. Your entire life has been a waste.
Lay down and die.
--
http://www.vitals.com/doctors/Dr_Ari_Silverstein.html

[w]

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:53:14 -0400, RMCG wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:09:05 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
>>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
>>> better.
>>
>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
>>
>>> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
>>
>> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)
>
> Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian. I grow for other people, not
> myself yeah I smoke the weed so ****ing what? I'm wondering why I
> bothered to register for this ****hole.

Looks like you got your fukken ass banned you stupid fukker.

*RMCG = /Guest/*

*BWAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*

https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread....79#post3807079

Trolls Are Attracted To Idiots; Idiots Respond to Trolls

[Ari Silverstein]

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:14:02 -0400, w wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:53:14 -0400, RMCG wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:09:05 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>
>>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
>>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
>>>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
>>>> better.
>>>
>>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
>>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
>>>
>>>> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
>>>
>>> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)
>>
>> Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian. I grow for other people, not
>> myself yeah I smoke the weed so ****ing what? I'm wondering why I
>> bothered to register for this ****hole.
>
> Looks like you got your fukken ass banned you stupid fukker.
>
> *RMCG = /Guest/*
>
> *BWAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*
>
> https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread....79#post3807079
>
> Trolls Are Attracted To Idiots; Idiots Respond to Trolls

wilburn, that's a darn shame. What a nice guy.

For an AssClown.

That he is.
--
Talk about F-Cars - www.ferrarichat.com/forum/member.php?u=89702

[effie]

Ari Silverstein <AriSilverstein@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:8dh7icF6ceU1@mid.individual.net:

> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 02:21:46 -0400, RMCG wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 02:18:46 -0400, Overgrow wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 06:03:49 +0000 (UTC), za kAT wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 02:01:11 -0400, RMCG wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
>>>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz
>>>>> and I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies
>>>>> that is better.
>>>>>
>>>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
>>>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
>>>>
>>>> Certainly youu jest. A proxy chain is better than Tor?
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
>>>>
>>>> Stoner. Figgers.
>>>
>>> Here's the thread the Stoner is trying to hide.
>>>
>>> https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=184479&page=7
>>>
>>> wilbur(n) aka nemo outis aka Peter Fairbrother is kicking his ass.
>>> rotflmao and sucking this idiot in further and further.
>>
>> ********. Answer my questions.
>
> My dear friend...
>
> Your questions are not worth the effort to answer. Here is why.
>
> 1) You have no clue wtf you are talking about.
> 2) No one will back an assclown who is rightfully getting his
> ass(clown) ass torn off.
> 3) See 1)
> 4) See 2)
>
> Tor, a DARPA funded, US Naval intelligence project that was picked up
> and refined over many years by top line cryptologists and this
> bucketload...
>
Tor a ****ed up system that does not work half the time. Drops
connections, not anonymous-nodes ****ing with ur data streams, cannot
do simple DNS lookups, cannot even handle simple chat.

We need something better; it's not gonna come from the Tor Developers,
they've had enough time and no results.

[Joseph Ashwood]

"RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
> better.
>
> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--


Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.

With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.

With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
exceptionally more difficult.

This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
Joe

[RMCG]

On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:08:37 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:

> "RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
>> better.
>>
>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
>
> Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.
>
> With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
> simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
> From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.
>
> With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
> systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
> exceptionally more difficult.
>
> This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
> Joe

I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant

These guys are the Nuts!! (if you play poker you know what I mean)

You can do an openvpn connection to one of their several servers
around the world, then add a ssh tunnel to another servers squid
proxy, and chain that to another servers socks 5 proxy. It can get
pretty slow the more you chain it, but it's about as secure as you can
get. Also, all their servers (according to them at least and I have
been given no reason to doubt them) have highly encrypted hard drives
on hardened Linux Servers and do not use any logging features at all.

[Ari Silverstein]

On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:21:03 -0400, RMCG wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:08:37 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
>
>> "RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
>>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
>>> better.
>>>
>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
>>
>> Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.
>>
>> With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
>> simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
>> From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.
>>
>> With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
>> systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
>> exceptionally more difficult.
>>
>> This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
>> Joe
>
> I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
> way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
> used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
> been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
> have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
> networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
> fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
>
> These guys are the Nuts!! (if you play poker you know what I mean)
>
> You can do an openvpn connection to one of their several servers
> around the world, then add a ssh tunnel to another servers squid
> proxy, and chain that to another servers socks 5 proxy. It can get
> pretty slow the more you chain it, but it's about as secure as you can
> get. Also, all their servers (according to them at least and I have
> been given no reason to doubt them) have highly encrypted hard drives
> on hardened Linux Servers and do not use any logging features at all.

They don't log?

lol

P-P just got their admins busted in Germany. When you go connecting to
servers all over creation, expect to run into some rather irrational
LEOs and damning judicial systems..

Btw, OpenVPN only supports 2Kbit PKE anf P-P claims they use 4K PKE
with OpenVPN.

Translation: They lie.

Tor.

Get over it.
--
Passwords, people, they are not just for game shows. If you refuse to
make the effort to remember a few long, diverse passwords, then don't
scream at me when your FICO is 496 and your bank accounts are zeroed
out.

[Buck Mulligan]

On 8/29/2010 3:53 PM, Ari Silverstein wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:21:03 -0400, RMCG wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:08:37 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
>>
>>> "RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
>>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
>>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
>>>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
>>>> better.
>>>>
>>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
>>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
>>> Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.
>>>
>>> With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
>>> simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
>>> From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.
>>>
>>> With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
>>> systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
>>> exceptionally more difficult.
>>>
>>> This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
>>> Joe
>> I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
>> way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
>> used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
>> been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
>> have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
>> networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
>> fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
>>
>> These guys are the Nuts!! (if you play poker you know what I mean)
>>
>> You can do an openvpn connection to one of their several servers
>> around the world, then add a ssh tunnel to another servers squid
>> proxy, and chain that to another servers socks 5 proxy. It can get
>> pretty slow the more you chain it, but it's about as secure as you can
>> get. Also, all their servers (according to them at least and I have
>> been given no reason to doubt them) have highly encrypted hard drives
>> on hardened Linux Servers and do not use any logging features at all.
> They don't log?
>
> lol
>
> P-P just got their admins busted in Germany. When you go connecting to
> servers all over creation, expect to run into some rather irrational
> LEOs and damning judicial systems..
>
> Btw, OpenVPN only supports 2Kbit PKE anf P-P claims they use 4K PKE
> with OpenVPN.
>
> Translation: They lie.
>
> Tor.
>
> Get over it.

Talking to yourself again, Frank? (a.k.a. Frank J. Camper, King of the
Sockpuppets)

No one else will talk to him, so he has to talk to himself using made up
characters with made up names.

Pitiful. Pathetic.

[Anonymous]

In article <4c7ab336@news.x-privat.org>
RMCG <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

>
> I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
> way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
> used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
> been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
> have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
> networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
> fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
>
> These guys are the Nuts!! (if you play poker you know what I mean)
>
> You can do an openvpn connection to one of their several servers
> around the world, then add a ssh tunnel to another servers squid
> proxy, and chain that to another servers socks 5 proxy. It can get
> pretty slow the more you chain it, but it's about as secure as you can
> get. Also, all their servers (according to them at least and I have
> been given no reason to doubt them) have highly encrypted hard drives
> on hardened Linux Servers and do not use any logging features at all.

It always boils down to the "no logging" thing.
Perfect-Privacy has the usual Terms and Conditions as found on
http://perfect-privacy.com/terms.html. If there truly is no logging, by
what means would Perfect-Privacy enforce their terms?

[Ari Silverstein]

On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:46:48 +0000, Anonymous wrote:

> In article <4c7ab336@news.x-privat.org>
> RMCG <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
>> way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
>> used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
>> been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
>> have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
>> networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
>> fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
>>
>> These guys are the Nuts!! (if you play poker you know what I mean)
>>
>> You can do an openvpn connection to one of their several servers
>> around the world, then add a ssh tunnel to another servers squid
>> proxy, and chain that to another servers socks 5 proxy. It can get
>> pretty slow the more you chain it, but it's about as secure as you can
>> get. Also, all their servers (according to them at least and I have
>> been given no reason to doubt them) have highly encrypted hard drives
>> on hardened Linux Servers and do not use any logging features at all.
>
> It always boils down to the "no logging" thing.
> Perfect-Privacy has the usual Terms and Conditions as found on
> http://perfect-privacy.com/terms.html. If there truly is no logging, by
> what means would Perfect-Privacy enforce their terms?

They can't but as a VPN they don't have too keep logs by law (USA). To
keep their systems running, they just remember everything.

*LOL*

Our friend Rocky Mountain Illegal Marijuana Grower has a couple of
problems. One, he's has a little knowledge that has exploded into his
version of genius and 2) he'll get his ass busted soon enough anyway
so what difference will it make?
--
http://www.vitals.com/doctors/Dr_Ari_Silverstein.html

[Ari Silverstein]

On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:38:24 -0400, Buck Mulligan wrote:

> Talking to yourself again, Frank? (a.k.a. Frank J. Camper, King of the
> Sockpuppets)

Frank, yeah, you got me there Lal Singh.

lol
--
Ari's Fun Times!
http://tr.im/hrFG
Motto: Run, rabbit, Run!

[RMCG]

On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:24:23 +0200 (CEST), Dave U. Random wrote:

> RMCG wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:08:37 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
>>
>>> "RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
>>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
>>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
>>>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
>>>> better.
>>>>
>>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
>>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
>>> Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.
>>>
>>> With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
>>> simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
>>> From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.
>>>
>>> With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
>>> systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
>>> exceptionally more difficult.
>>>
>>> This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
>>> Joe
>>
>> I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
>> way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
>> used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
>> been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
>> have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
>> networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
>> fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
>>
>
> Good luck with your traffic over there at, ahem, "Perfect Privacy"
>
> https://blog.perfect-privacy.com/201...-house-search/

All you *******s can go **** yourselves. These are the so called
experts, you guys don't know **** a bunch of Google users who claim
expertise. Total ********. Pathetic. Pitiful.

Unless you have EVIDENCE that P-P is bad, go **** yourself and STFUp

[Buck Mulligan]

On 8/30/2010 5:56 PM, RMCG wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:24:23 +0200 (CEST), Dave U. Random wrote:
>
>> RMCG wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:08:37 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
>>>
>>>> "RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
>>>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
>>>>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
>>>>> better.
>>>>>
>>>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
>>>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
>>>> Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.
>>>>
>>>> With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
>>>> simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
>>>> From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.
>>>>
>>>> With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
>>>> systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
>>>> exceptionally more difficult.
>>>>
>>>> This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
>>>> Joe
>>> I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
>>> way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
>>> used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
>>> been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
>>> have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
>>> networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
>>> fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
>>>
>> Good luck with your traffic over there at, ahem, "Perfect Privacy"
>>
>> https://blog.perfect-privacy.com/201...-house-search/
> All you *******s can go **** yourselves. These are the so called
> experts, you guys don't know **** a bunch of Google users who claim
> expertise. Total ********. Pathetic. Pitiful.
>
> Unless you have EVIDENCE that P-P is bad, go **** yourself and STFUp

The unmistakable fingerprint of Frank J. Camper (a.k.a. Ari Silverstein,
The King of the Sockpuppets)

If by chance somebody does condescends, and respond to him, but doesn't
reply with what he wants so desperately to read, he always retreats and
starts using profanity, thinking this will make him look like a MAN!!

So pitiful, and so pathetic.

Calm down, Frank. You look like a fool.

[Ari Silverstein]

On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:56:33 -0400, RMCG wrote:

> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:24:23 +0200 (CEST), Dave U. Random wrote:
>
>> RMCG wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:08:37 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
>>>
>>>> "RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
>>>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
>>>>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
>>>>> better.
>>>>>
>>>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
>>>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
>>>> Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.
>>>>
>>>> With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
>>>> simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
>>>> From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.
>>>>
>>>> With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
>>>> systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
>>>> exceptionally more difficult.
>>>>
>>>> This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
>>>> Joe
>>>
>>> I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
>>> way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
>>> used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
>>> been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
>>> have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
>>> networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
>>> fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
>>>
>>
>> Good luck with your traffic over there at, ahem, "Perfect Privacy"
>>
>> https://blog.perfect-privacy.com/201...-house-search/
>
> All you *******s can go **** yourselves. These are the so called
> experts, you guys don't know **** a bunch of Google users who claim
> expertise. Total ********. Pathetic. Pitiful.
>
> Unless you have EVIDENCE that P-P is bad, go **** yourself and STFUp

You need to get your lies in order. First you claim to be "daisy
chaining" proxies now you're a firmly entrenched Piss-Poor-Privacy
evangelist.

I know chameleons that change less often. lol

Piss-Poor-Privacy is a PITA. Been there, done that, ain't going back.
Every reboot or dropped connect has to be login ID, password and
reselected a server. Since you are hopping around all over the damn
world, try that out on Google Gmail and dozens of other sites which
spam filter or blacklist logins from multiple IPs. Dropped connection
means Internet shutoff, nopers, Got to get that elsewhere
(VPNCheck,outgoing firewall, etc)

I can't remember the speed except from the USA based servers it
sucked. Big time. Hell, might as well use Tor...for free...and much
more private.

But you know that since you had to change your stance to keep from
getting continually clobbered for your lousy "daisy chaining"
protocol.

lol

Assclown.

That you are.
--
Talk about F-Cars - www.ferrarichat.com/forum/member.php?u=89702

[Ari Silverstein]

On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:14:16 -0400, Buck Mulligan wrote:

>>> https://blog.perfect-privacy.com/201...-house-search/
>>> Total ********. Pathetic. Pitiful.

>
> So pitiful, and so pathetic.


Speaking of "fingerprints"...*LOL*

> Calm down, Frank. You look like a fool.

Thanks, Ammand.
--
Ari's Fun Times!
http://tr.im/hrFG
Motto: Run, rabbit, Run!