Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Re: DGL 4590

  1. #1
    James Egan
    Guest

    Re: DGL 4590


    On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:01:01 -0700, Random
    <Random@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

    >Has anybody been able to loop back? Meaning go out of your router and come
    >back in with your WAN IPort to get to your IPCAM to see if it works from
    >the WAN side? I can easily see the IPCAM with LAN side IP but not WANIPort.
    >Port forwarding is set up properly


    Assuming your router is capable of doing what you are attempting, you
    need to consider how the ipcam can reply to connections from your lan
    computer.

    If the IPCAM and PC are on the same lan subnet, the router's initial
    address translation and forwarding will work okay but replies will go
    directly from the IPCAM to PC bypassing the router which can't then do
    the required reverse translation.


    Jim.


  2. #2
    James Egan
    Guest

    Re: DGL 4590


    On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:31:00 -0700, Random
    <Random@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

    >The IPCAM is 192.168.1.210 my PC is .200. I can get to the IPCAM using
    >192.168.1.210 from my PC.
    >I bought this 'more expensive' router mainly because I need the ability to
    >readily assign an IP adrress to a MAC address. (Not just have the MAC address
    >be able to get an IP from the pool I assigned as available. Needed for port
    >forwarding.)
    >But I remember with less expensive routers I've worked with I was able to
    >enter my current WAN IP and port number and make it to the IPCAM. Without
    >that capability I can't confirm that I can get to the IPCAM from the WAN.
    >Everybody would have this same problem. This seems like such a basic required
    >capability. How can anyone set up LAN side servers and confirm connectivity
    >from the WAN? I can't imagine that we are expected to go to some other AP to
    >see if connectivity works! I have to be missing something here!!!


    It's not impossible. It's just harder than it appears initially.

    This link explains the problems and proposed solutions when using a
    BSD box as a router. Although you are using a dedicated router, the
    problems will be the same and the solutions or workarounds required
    will be similar.
    http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html


    Jim.


Similar Threads

  1. Re: DGL 4590
    By Jack \(MVP-Networking\). in forum ms.public.windows.networking.wireless
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-25-08, 10:07 PM
  2. D-Link DGL 4100 Gamefuel questions
    By Kynetik in forum General Broadband Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-28-07, 11:49 AM
  3. D-link dgl 4100 didn't improve my home network
    By micsim749 in forum Routers & Internet Sharing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-11-07, 10:36 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •