Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed

***Roody*** · 05-03-08, 09:06 AM

Originally Posted by Debbie

ditto...

Thanks for the support Debbie.

**Debbie** · 05-03-08, 09:06 AM

Originally Posted by YARDofSTUF

Did you see it too?

I plan on it. I am not going to comment on the content of the movie until I see it.

I feel that knocking something that you have not experienced is like talking out of your ass. I never go by what other people say. To each his own.

**Izzo** · 05-03-08, 09:10 AM

Originally Posted by Roody

Wow. That's pretty pathetic dude. So you now consider movie reviews to be a point of accuracy on something that has or hasn't happened. Apparently in your world ALL movie reviews are accurate. When you use that as an excuse not to see something your logic becomes even more flawed.

That is certainly something worthy of being

at.

They'll certainly give me a good idea of the film and if I consider the source credible enough...absolutely. I didn't expect you to have an unbiased opinion of being the religious person you are. In my world?....who's pathetic? You gonna give me another infraction now?

**YARDofSTUF** · 05-03-08, 09:10 AM

Originally Posted by Debbie

What makes you think that user reviews are any different? I agree with Roody on this one.

Well theres a ton more, and like with yahoo reviews they total all the ratings up, give you an average, and for this movie its actually a B- with 3400 reviews, so thats not too bad. Generally I have found that the yahoo average for user reviews are a good scale to base what to see on if I'm interested in teh topic of the movie.

If you don't use any kind of reviews how do you avoid crappy movies?

The only time I remember yahoo movies letting me down was Open Water.

**YARDofSTUF** · 05-03-08, 09:11 AM

Originally Posted by Debbie

I plan on it. I am not going to comment on the content of the movie until I see it.

I feel that knocking something that you have not experienced is like talking out of your ass. I never go by what other people say. To each his own.

Well remember to post here if you liked it or not.

**Izzo** · 05-03-08, 09:11 AM

Originally Posted by Roody

As I said you haven't seen it. If you want to judge something with little knowledge of it then you go right ahead.

Also..I've judged it only unworthy of my viewing. Where have I attacked the film in this thread?

**Debbie** · 05-03-08, 09:12 AM

I never worry whether or not a movie is crappy or not. I choose one. I see it. It is not like I go and spend $10 on a movie 7-days a week.

**YARDofSTUF** · 05-03-08, 09:17 AM

Originally Posted by Debbie

I never worry whether or not a movie is crappy or not. I choose one. I see it. It is not like I go and spend $10 on a movie 7-days a week.

I treat picking a movie like buying a car

**Debbie** · 05-03-08, 09:18 AM

Originally Posted by YARDofSTUF

I treat picking a movie like buying a car

No.....your wallet squeaks!!

**Izzo** · 05-03-08, 09:19 AM

Originally Posted by YARDofSTUF

I treat picking a movie like buying a car

me too...if I hear/read it's a crap ride i'm not buying it.

***Roody*** · 05-03-08, 09:28 AM

Originally Posted by Izzo

Also..I've judged it only unworthy of my viewing. Where have I attacked the film in this thread?

Pretty much every post you made has been something negative about the film. Again as I said you have to see the film to have any real credible view on the subject. Without doing so it's pretty much an incomplete view.

***Roody*** · 05-03-08, 09:30 AM

Originally Posted by Izzo

They'll certainly give me a good idea of the film and if I consider the source credible enough...absolutely. I didn't expect you to have an unbiased opinion of being the religious person you are. In my world?....who's pathetic? You gonna give me another infraction now?

I have no problems with people disagreeing with me. Where the issue lies is with how people do disagree. If they are nasty then I will come after them no doubt. I was wrong for the prick remark I made in the past and that's why I said sorry. However, if I ever get another "**** you" comment made to me from you again whether it's in PM or not I can pretty much assure you that one of us will no longer be here because I won't tolerate that kind of comment made to me. I can get upset with insults, but saying "**** you" to someone is IMO the lowest form of comment made from one person to another.

**YARDofSTUF** · 05-03-08, 09:35 AM

A bit off topic but I could probably come up with some comments "lower" than an "F you" to someone.

:angel:

**Debbie** · 05-03-08, 09:37 AM

Stirring the pot eh?

**Izzo** · 05-03-08, 09:39 AM

Originally Posted by Roody

I have no problems with people disagreeing with me. Where the issue lies is with how people do disagree. If they are nasty then I will come after them no doubt. I was wrong for the prick remark I made in the past and that's why I said sorry. However, if I ever get another "**** you" comment made to me from you again whether it's in PM or not I can pretty much assure you that one of us will no longer be here because I won't tolerate that kind of comment made to me. I can get upset with insults, but saying "**** you" to someone is IMO the lowest form of comment made from one person to another.

Whatever you say, Sporto. I was anything but nasty in this thread even after you came at me. I clearly posted that I was giving you and others additional information about the film and Stein and you somehow turned that into an attack on the film

And now you bring contents of a private message into the thread as a threat in response to my last post.

It's not I with issues and I assure you if you give me another infraction in a thread for which you apologize for insulting me in i'll tell you the same thing.

Toodles

**YARDofSTUF** · 05-03-08, 09:43 AM

Originally Posted by Izzo

Whatever you say, Sporto. I was anything but nasty in this thread even after you came at me. I clearly posted that I was giving you and others additional information about the film and Stein and you somehow turned that into an attack on the film

And now you bring contents of a private message into the thread as a threat in response to my last post.

It's not I with issues and I assure you if you give me another infraction in a thread for which you apologize for insulting me in i'll tell you the same thing.

Toodles

Woa, you got an infraction for your post(s) in this thread?

**Debbie** · 05-03-08, 09:44 AM

I don't understand you guys. All I see is that Roody just wanted to communicate the fact that you should see for yourself before you denounce it. When it comes to films, you can't always go by what other people say or write about it. Do you guys have minds of your own?

This is typical SG Drama Queen crap. You guys have every right to respond and so does Roody. There is no reason for it to turn out like this.

**Izzo** · 05-03-08, 09:46 AM

Originally Posted by YARDofSTUF

Woa, you got an infraction for your post(s) in this thread?

Not yet.

***Roody*** · 05-03-08, 09:46 AM

Originally Posted by Izzo

Whatever you say, Sporto. I was anything but nasty in this thread even after you came at me. I clearly posted that I was giving you and others additional information about the film and Stein and you somehow turned that into an attack on the film

And now you bring contents of a private message into the thread as a threat in response to my last post.

It's not I with issues and I assure you if you give me another infraction in a thread for which you apologize for insulting me in i'll tell you the same thing.

Toodles

and if you do like I said one of us will be gone because you will either be banned or I will resign as MOD. You got your infraction before the prick remark came up and I made sure to apologize for the remark, but as I said if you say "**** you" to me again one of those two situations WILL occur.