View Full Version : High Quality Digital Camera Pictures (Post em if you got em)
Just took these wtih my camera
Sony DSC-P30
labled approprietly
http://www.speedguide.net/~brent/hq
HongKongPolice
06-30-02, 06:38 PM
What cam specs? I can't find its review on steve's digicam site
HongKongPolice
06-30-02, 06:39 PM
Nvm, i found it, wtf, its only 1.3Megapixels?!?!?
CableDude
06-30-02, 06:40 PM
Good stuff there, Brent. :)
Forgetful
06-30-02, 06:41 PM
Not sure if this counts as high quality, taken with a borrowed Fujitsu 2.3 megapixel on a picnic a couple of weeks ago.
http://jdb2jdb.20m.com/images/hebdon_bridge_park_006.jpg
Originally posted by TigerUpperCut
Nvm, i found it, wtf, its only 1.3Megapixels?!?!?
you must be a dig camera newb ;)
megapixels are only important if you print the pictures out on paper
it has nothing to do with quality of the pic as an image file ;)
Banshee
06-30-02, 06:47 PM
finding new host
Banshee
06-30-02, 06:50 PM
Originally posted by Brent
it has nothing to do with quality of the pic as an image file ;)
that’s not entirely true
0.85MP digi cams look like webcams and i can notice a huge difference in picture quality between a 1MP and a 6MP camera
Originally posted by Banshee
that’s not entirely true
0.85MP digi cams look like webcams and i can notice a huge difference in picture quality between a 1MP and a 6MP camera
i'm not dig cam expert either :p
Nikon Coolpix 800...I took this right after I hit a $1200 jackpot in Las Vegas last October. Right afterward, a security guard got all over me about taking pictures in the casino.
http://www.burkehamblin.net/images/speedguide/jackpot.jpg
m4a2t0t
06-30-02, 07:33 PM
ill post more later, i was kinda in a hurry
Water (http://m4a2t0t.homestead.com/files/water.jpg)
sony dsc-p50 3.2 Mpixel
image is 2048x1536
Some plant I found whilst at work. Called rattlesnake plant I believe. Found it at the entrance of a smallish cave. Lotsa mosquitos, and looked scary inside, so I didn't probe it.
Oh, Sony DSC-S70 3.2 megapixel, marco lens(Carl Zeiss)
http://66.186.219.149/rattlesnake.JPG
kneemeister
06-30-02, 08:05 PM
http://www.kneebush.com/Trip%20to%20Calf,%202002,%20SFKK%20Superman,%20TE.jpg
Taken with a Canon S100, what the S330 replaced.
Banshee
06-30-02, 08:16 PM
Originally posted by kneemeister
Taken with a Canon S100, what the S330 replaced.
the 330 replaced the 300 and the 200 replaced the 110 :p :p
kneemeister
06-30-02, 08:23 PM
Originally posted by Banshee
the 330 replaced the 300 and the 200 replaced the 110 :p :p
the 100 was more like the 300 than the 110. same stainless steel, just no video. the 110 was plastic that looked like stainless steel
Oh well, I rode Superman and you didn't:p :p
TEH WIN
06-30-02, 09:03 PM
this pic is amazing brent
http://www.speedguide.net/~brent/hq/water2_notice_waterparticles_spewing_off.jpg
Deus ex Machina
06-30-02, 09:41 PM
Nice pictures Brent!
Most of mine I had posted in the past or they are close ups off peoples teeth.
Here are a few I have for fun.
www.twangs.net/daoimages/108-0841_IMG.JPG
www.twangs.net/daoimages/108-0843_IMG.JPG
www.twangs.net/daoimages/107-0752_IMG.JPG
ms_pammy
06-30-02, 09:48 PM
I'm still learning with my dig cam.
most of the pics posted here are very big, so is it with digital camera's the bigger the better? or are most here just big cuz they are?
What is the best setting to put my camera to get the best quality?
The higher the resolution the photo is taken at the more you have to work with,resizing,cropping,detail.Always resize to a lower resolution,never larger.
UpClose (http://webpages.charter.net/mlanter/UpClose)
Deus ex Machina
06-30-02, 09:59 PM
Originally posted by ms_pammy
I'm still learning with my dig cam.
most of the pics posted here are very big, so is it with digital camera's the bigger the better? or are most here just big cuz they are?
What is the best setting to put my camera to get the best quality?
The size of the images are related to the pixel resolution.
On the digital side of the equation, best quality will have the highest pixel resolution with the least compression. The camera side of the equation becomes a question of lens/camera quality and artistic intent.
www.twangs.net/daoimages/108-0893_IMG.JPG
Needlefreak
07-01-02, 06:07 AM
Cool pixs from everybody..The flowing water is kewl..I gottta try that....Here's my contribution,I'll post the first and link the rest..All pics were taken with a Nikon Coolpix 995 set on 1024x768 / fine...
http://www.hostriot.com/072002/DSCN0941.JPG
http://home.attbi.com/~enduraduck/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-200662.html
http://home.attbi.com/~enduraduck/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-200665.html
http://home.attbi.com/~enduraduck/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-123190.html
morbidpete
07-01-02, 05:38 PM
sony dsc-s75
http://members.cox.net/xboxus/sony 001.jpg
thechemgeek
07-01-02, 05:57 PM
heh..ok...my turn....here (http://home.adelphia.net/~binap/pics/DSC00563_.jpg). i cut the size in half....kinda big.
Banshee
07-01-02, 06:19 PM
huge pics
http://members.accesstoledo.com/bwiatrak/highres/water1.jpg
http://members.accesstoledo.com/bwiatrak/highres/water2.jpg
http://members.accesstoledo.com/bwiatrak/highres/water3.jpg
http://members.accesstoledo.com/bwiatrak/highres/rockets.jpg
http://members.accesstoledo.com/bwiatrak/highres/headphones.jpg
http://members.accesstoledo.com/bwiatrak/highres/light.jpg
http://members.accesstoledo.com/bwiatrak/highres/evilcat.jpg
http://members.accesstoledo.com/bwiatrak/highres/amber.jpg
Jesse23
07-01-02, 06:20 PM
nutshee and brent how much were you cams?
Banshee
07-01-02, 06:22 PM
$400
http://powershot.com/powershot2/s330/index.html
Jesse23
07-01-02, 06:32 PM
my cousin has some $1200 sony cam
Connection killer
http://216.183.147.19/swamp2.jpg
Jesse23
07-01-02, 06:33 PM
nmm diff cam
http://www.sonystyle.com/home/item.jsp?hierc=9682x9128x9045&catid=&itemid=12321
m4a2t0t
07-01-02, 07:09 PM
ATF a.k.a."Alaskan Thunder Fvk";) (http://66.1.88.150/My Pictures/herb/ATF.jpg)
Yummy!!!
gonna be a tad bit slow cause i havta host it on my server until homestead fixes their $hit
Originally posted by brembo
Some plant I found whilst at work. Called rattlesnake plant I believe. Found it at the entrance of a smallish cave. Lotsa mosquitos, and looked scary inside, so I didn't probe it.
Oh, Sony DSC-S70 3.2 megapixel, marco lens(Carl Zeiss)
http://66.186.219.149/rattlesnake.JPG
Brembo, I've got the same camera, 3.3 is on mine. Where did you get the macro lens? I checked out a few lenses but I'm not sure which is best.
morbidpete
08-01-02, 03:12 PM
sony dsc-s75 3.3 megapixel. 2048x1536 iso 400. i didnt seem to get all the lines with auto and lower speeds.
http://members.cox.net/morbidpete/DSC00409.JPG
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.