View Full Version : Bandwith allocation with broadband routers?
glassvial
01-04-01, 12:45 AM
Does anyone know if any available broadband routers support bandwith allocation? I've been looking into a 4 port broadband router (ie: Linksys, Ugate) but I require the ability to limit bandwith usage on each port. None of the reviews seem to even mention this feature, or lack thereof? Any info is appreciated.
Welcome to Speed Guide glassvial...
I believe you need a Cisco router for that prerequisite. I don't think a consumer router will suffice.
nightowl
01-04-01, 01:31 AM
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by glc1:
Welcome to Speed Guide glassvial...
I believe you need a Cisco router for that prerequisite. I don't think a consumer router will suffice.</font>
which means you are going to have to spend alot of cash for it
------------------
http://www3.sympatico.ca/malcolm.norman/canadian.gif
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by nightowl:
which means you are going to have to spend alot of cash for it
</font>You better believe it. http://www.speedguide.net/ubb/biggrin.gif
glassvial
01-04-01, 10:02 AM
And I take it they probably don't make one that has all the features a consumer model does, like NAT, firewall, DMZ, virtual ports, etc? I guess given my situation (if Cisco is not an option?) what model would be recommended as "best" of the bunch? Thanks.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by glassvial:
And I take it they probably don't make one that has all the features a consumer model does, like NAT, firewall, DMZ, virtual ports, etc?</font>Not that I'm aware of, however, you may want to do further research on the matter.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by :
I guess given my situation (if Cisco is not an option?) what model would be recommended as "best" of the bunch? </font>From what I've read/heard, the Ugate and Netgear seem to be getting the most acclaim. You may want to go through SG's reviews section here (http://www.speedguide.net/reviews/index.shtml).
[This message has been edited by glc1 (edited 01-04-2001).]
I took a look at some Cisco equipment for ya and the best I could find you is Cisco's DOCSIS cable modem / router combo.
(http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/900/prodlit/index.shtml)
The problem is that its built in ethernet ports are 10 meg shared ports (its a hub)....
Looking for that specific feature set you would have to implement QOS to do it (which just gaurentee's queue priority) OR you have to go with a Cisco Catalyst switch with a RSM (Route Switch Module, makes it a layer 3 switch) but you're looking at some big bucks to get a switch with an RSM blade in it. The industry just doesn't see this type of feature set as in demand for the SOHO arena...
I am not even sure if that little router has the Cisco IOS 12.x on it...
------------------
Cheers,
Chris Burgy
Network Analyst
Chevron
glassvial
01-05-01, 08:44 PM
Funny you mention the Cisco router/modem because we got RR installed at the office today and that's exactly what they gave us, a 924. It really sucks that it's a hub but it does have 4 ports. No uplink that I could see (which sucks!) and the guy who set it up basically just did a basic configuration. Asking questions like, "is this secure, does it have a firewall?" he didn't have the answer to. The only thing he knew for sure was that DHCP and NAT were both not working/busted. Oh, that and the fact that we're not supposed to mess with the programming on it. So I guess that brings me to my next point, should I run a SOHO broadband router behind this router in fear of their lack of security and NAT, or should I just uplink this (somehow) to our switch?
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.