Re: Newfangled rootkits survive hard disk wiping

[BoaterDave]

On Apr 1, 11:30*am, "FromTheRafters" <erra...@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:
> "BoaterDave" <BoaterD...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:03d5c564-eb2c-4548-a1bd-76710dce5097@w9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>
> > This article
> >http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/24/persistent_bios_rootkits/
> > refers to "unfettered root access"
>
> > Perhaps a silly question - if one connects to another server
> > deliberately for the purpose of sending and receiving messages in a
> > newsgroup (thus making a hole in one's defences?)
>
> When a legitimate path is made, I wouldn't call it a hole in one
> defenses.
>

Just to be clear about this, FTR - if I connect to the newsgroups at
annexcafe.com (a private server) using Outlook Express, or any another
Newreader, have I a created a 'way in' to my computer in spite of
having a NAT router between me and the Internet?

> > might this be
> > giving *"unfettered root access" if one is operating with
> > Administrator privileges?
>
> This is why you should *not* be running with administrative privileges
> unless you are doing administrative tasks.

So, again to be clear, is your answer "yes"?

I value your opinions, FTR - thank you for posting in reply to my
queries. :)

FYI - I started responding to you using Thunderbird but an error
message from Thunderbird appeared before I had completed all I had to
say. The only way out was to force the programme to quit, thus losing
all I had written. It has happened before. It's as if someone is
reviewing my message as I write it to decide if I should or should not
be allowed to send it. That could never be the case ........ could it?
*This* message is being sent through Google groups using the Internet
rather than from a newsreader - that's why I use BoaterDave when
posting from Google Groups and ~BD~ when using a newsreader - it helps
me to remember from whence I actually posted!

--
Dave

[Tim Jackson]

BoaterDave wrote:

> FYI - I started responding to you using Thunderbird but an error
> message from Thunderbird appeared before I had completed all I had to
> say. The only way out was to force the programme to quit, thus losing
> all I had written. It has happened before. It's as if someone is
> reviewing my message as I write it to decide if I should or should not
> be allowed to send it. That could never be the case ........ could it?


Set a short auto-save period in Thunderbirds options
(composition/general), or use File/Save regularly to ensure a copy of
what you were typing is retained in Drafts if it crashes.

If the error is repeatable maybe you could track down the event that
causes the crash, and report it.


Tim Jackson

[~BD~]

Tim Jackson wrote:
> BoaterDave wrote:
>
>> FYI - I started responding to you using Thunderbird but an error
>> message from Thunderbird appeared before I had completed all I had to
>> say. The only way out was to force the programme to quit, thus losing
>> all I had written. It has happened before. It's as if someone is
>> reviewing my message as I write it to decide if I should or should not
>> be allowed to send it. That could never be the case ........ could it?
>
>
> Set a short auto-save period in Thunderbirds options
> (composition/general), or use File/Save regularly to ensure a copy of
> what you were typing is retained in Drafts if it crashes.
>
> If the error is repeatable maybe you could track down the event that
> causes the crash, and report it.
>
>
> Tim Jackson

Thanks for the advice, Tim. :)

Auto-save was set to the default of 5 mins - I've reduced it to 2 mins.

The drop-down 'error' message was something like "this message cannot be
saved in you Drafts folder" - but wouldn't let me cancel *or* continue.
i.e. not crashed exactly - but stuffed!

--
Dave

[Unruh]

BoaterDave <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> writes:

>On Apr 1, 11:30=A0am, "FromTheRafters" <erra...@nomail.afraid.org>
>wrote:
>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterD...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>
>> news:03d5c564-eb2c-4548-a1bd-76710dce5097@w9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > This article
>> >http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/24/persistent_bios_rootkits/
>> > refers to "unfettered root access"
>>
>> > Perhaps a silly question - if one connects to another server
>> > deliberately for the purpose of sending and receiving messages in a
>> > newsgroup (thus making a hole in one's defences?)
>>
>> When a legitimate path is made, I wouldn't call it a hole in one
>> defenses.
>>

>Just to be clear about this, FTR - if I connect to the newsgroups at
>annexcafe.com (a private server) using Outlook Express, or any another
>Newreader, have I a created a 'way in' to my computer in spite of
>having a NAT router between me and the Internet?

A NAT router is not very much of a protection. You should also have a
firewall on your computer or on your router.


>> > might this be
>> > giving =A0"unfettered root access" if one is operating with
>> > Administrator privileges?

Yes, it might be. Anything you download and which runs runs as
administrator and can thus do anything. Now usually news is not that that
dangerous-- it tends not to run things. But if there is a bug in your
newsreader, all bets are off. It is called defence in depth. You do not
rely on just one thing to defend you.


>>
>> This is why you should *not* be running with administrative privileges
>> unless you are doing administrative tasks.

>So, again to be clear, is your answer "yes"?

>I value your opinions, FTR - thank you for posting in reply to my
>queries. :)

>FYI - I started responding to you using Thunderbird but an error
>message from Thunderbird appeared before I had completed all I had to
>say. The only way out was to force the programme to quit, thus losing
>all I had written. It has happened before. It's as if someone is
>reviewing my message as I write it to decide if I should or should not
>be allowed to send it. That could never be the case ........ could it?

Who knows. Yes, you could be running a rogue version of Thunderbird.


>*This* message is being sent through Google groups using the Internet
>rather than from a newsreader - that's why I use BoaterDave when
>posting from Google Groups and ~BD~ when using a newsreader - it helps
>me to remember from whence I actually posted!

[Tim Jackson]

~BD~ wrote:
> Tim Jackson wrote:
>> BoaterDave wrote:
>>
>>> FYI - I started responding to you using Thunderbird but an error
>>> message from Thunderbird appeared before I had completed all I had to
>>> say. The only way out was to force the programme to quit, thus losing
>>> all I had written. It has happened before. It's as if someone is
>>> reviewing my message as I write it to decide if I should or should not
>>> be allowed to send it. That could never be the case ........ could it?
>>
>>
>> Set a short auto-save period in Thunderbirds options
>> (composition/general), or use File/Save regularly to ensure a copy of
>> what you were typing is retained in Drafts if it crashes.
>>
>> If the error is repeatable maybe you could track down the event that
>> causes the crash, and report it.
>>
>>
>> Tim Jackson
>
> Thanks for the advice, Tim. :)
>
> Auto-save was set to the default of 5 mins - I've reduced it to 2 mins.
>
> The drop-down 'error' message was something like "this message cannot be
> saved in you Drafts folder" - but wouldn't let me cancel *or* continue.
> i.e. not crashed exactly - but stuffed!
>
> --
> Dave

That's usually something to do with embedded images getting screwed up,
eg if you copy one out of another message it only copies the link, not
the image body, but the link is intra-message so it gets left hanging
and can't be attached on save. (You have to save a copy to your HD and
attach from there.) But that shouldn't happen in a Usenet post.

It could possibly having two edited versions of the same message open,
contending for the same Drafts file.

You could always try sending it to yourself instead of saving it.


Tim

[Ari®]

On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:12:15 -0700 (PDT), BoaterDave wrote:

> Just to be clear about this, FTR - if I connect to the newsgroups at
> annexcafe.com (a private server) using Outlook Express, or any another
> Newreader, have I a created a 'way in' to my computer in spite of
> having a NAT router between me and the Internet?

Yes.
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!

[Ari®]

On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:23:47 GMT, Unruh wrote:

> Yes, it might be. Anything you download and which runs runs as
> administrator and can thus do anything. Now usually news is not that that
> dangerous-- it tends not to run things. But if there is a bug in your
> newsreader, all bets are off. It is called defence in depth. You do not
> rely on just one thing to defend you.

So never turning your computer on won't work?
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!

[Unruh]

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Ari=AE?= <AriSilverstein@army.com> writes:

>On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:23:47 GMT, Unruh wrote:

>> Yes, it might be. Anything you download and which runs runs as
>> administrator and can thus do anything. Now usually news is not that that
>> dangerous-- it tends not to run things. But if there is a bug in your
>> newsreader, all bets are off. It is called defence in depth. You do not
>> rely on just one thing to defend you.

>So never turning your computer on won't work?

Nope. Because your wife comes in one morning and says, what is this
computer doing here switched off. I can use it, and switches it on.

[~BD~]

Ari® wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:12:15 -0700 (PDT), BoaterDave wrote:
>
>> Just to be clear about this, FTR - if I connect to the newsgroups at
>> annexcafe.com (a private server) using Outlook Express, or any another
>> Newreader, have I a created a 'way in' to my computer in spite of
>> having a NAT router between me and the Internet?
>
> Yes.

Thank you, Ari :)

Ever been there? The User2User group (one in the USA, one in the UK).

They'd tear you to pieces! *Very* clever folk there!
--
Dave

[Ari®]

On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:48:18 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> Ari® wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:12:15 -0700 (PDT), BoaterDave wrote:
>>
>>> Just to be clear about this, FTR - if I connect to the newsgroups at
>>> annexcafe.com (a private server) using Outlook Express, or any another
>>> Newreader, have I a created a 'way in' to my computer in spite of
>>> having a NAT router between me and the Internet?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Thank you, Ari :)
>
> Ever been there? The User2User group (one in the USA, one in the UK).

Yes.

> They'd tear you to pieces! *Very* clever folk there!

Yeah.
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!

[John Smith]

Ari® wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:48:18 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Ari® wrote:
>>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:12:15 -0700 (PDT), BoaterDave wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just to be clear about this, FTR - if I connect to the newsgroups at
>>>> annexcafe.com (a private server) using Outlook Express, or any another
>>>> Newreader, have I a created a 'way in' to my computer in spite of
>>>> having a NAT router between me and the Internet?
>>> Yes.
>> Thank you, Ari :)
>>
>> Ever been there? The User2User group (one in the USA, one in the UK).
>
> Yes.
>
>> They'd tear you to pieces! *Very* clever folk there!
>
> Yeah.
Someone got their feelings hurt, doo da doo da, oh da doo da dey

[~BD~]

"Tim Jackson" <tim@tim-jackson.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Q92dnTEfSY2PO07UnZ2dnUVZ8q6WnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> Tim Jackson wrote:
>>> BoaterDave wrote:
>>>
>>>> FYI - I started responding to you using Thunderbird but an error
>>>> message from Thunderbird appeared before I had completed all I had to
>>>> say. The only way out was to force the programme to quit, thus losing
>>>> all I had written. It has happened before. It's as if someone is
>>>> reviewing my message as I write it to decide if I should or should not
>>>> be allowed to send it. That could never be the case ........ could it?
>>>
>>>
>>> Set a short auto-save period in Thunderbirds options
>>> (composition/general), or use File/Save regularly to ensure a copy of
>>> what you were typing is retained in Drafts if it crashes.
>>>
>>> If the error is repeatable maybe you could track down the event that
>>> causes the crash, and report it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Tim Jackson
>>
>> Thanks for the advice, Tim. :)
>>
>> Auto-save was set to the default of 5 mins - I've reduced it to 2 mins.
>>
>> The drop-down 'error' message was something like "this message cannot be
>> saved in you Drafts folder" - but wouldn't let me cancel *or* continue.
>> i.e. not crashed exactly - but stuffed!
>>
>> --
>> Dave
>
> That's usually something to do with embedded images getting screwed up, eg
> if you copy one out of another message it only copies the link, not the
> image body, but the link is intra-message so it gets left hanging and
> can't be attached on save. (You have to save a copy to your HD and attach
> from there.) But that shouldn't happen in a Usenet post.
>
> It could possibly having two edited versions of the same message open,
> contending for the same Drafts file.
>
> You could always try sending it to yourself instead of saving it.
>
>
> Tim

I missed your reply, Tim - sorry for not responding.

I'll bear in mind what you have said. It did happen again and this is
exactly what happened:-

A dropdown window said 'Confirm' "There was an error coppying the message to
the Sent folder. Retry?" Options were 'Cancel' or 'OK'

Clicking on 'OK' just re-issued the same 'Confirm' dropdown window.

Clicking on 'Cancel' initiated another dropdown window - 'Save Draft Error'
"Unable to save your message as a draft. Please verify that your Mail and
Newsgroup account settings are correct and try again". Only one option 'OK'

Clicking 'OK' resulted in the previous 'Confirm' dropdown window!!

Stuck in a loop - the only way out was to shut down Thunderbird (and lose
what had been written - grrr!)

Cheers

David

[~BD~]

My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.

Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware firewall.

You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that correct?

--
Dave

"Unruh" <unruh-spam@physics.ubc.ca> wrote in message
news:DqNAl.19551$Db2.864@edtnps83...
> BoaterDave <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> writes:
>
>>On Apr 1, 11:30=A0am, "FromTheRafters" <erra...@nomail.afraid.org>
>>wrote:
>>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterD...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:03d5c564-eb2c-4548-a1bd-76710dce5097@w9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> > This article
>>> >http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/24/persistent_bios_rootkits/
>>> > refers to "unfettered root access"
>>>
>>> > Perhaps a silly question - if one connects to another server
>>> > deliberately for the purpose of sending and receiving messages in a
>>> > newsgroup (thus making a hole in one's defences?)
>>>
>>> When a legitimate path is made, I wouldn't call it a hole in one
>>> defenses.
>>>
>
>>Just to be clear about this, FTR - if I connect to the newsgroups at
>>annexcafe.com (a private server) using Outlook Express, or any another
>>Newreader, have I a created a 'way in' to my computer in spite of
>>having a NAT router between me and the Internet?
>
> A NAT router is not very much of a protection. You should also have a
> firewall on your computer or on your router.
>
>
>>> > might this be
>>> > giving =A0"unfettered root access" if one is operating with
>>> > Administrator privileges?
>
> Yes, it might be. Anything you download and which runs runs as
> administrator and can thus do anything. Now usually news is not that that
> dangerous-- it tends not to run things. But if there is a bug in your
> newsreader, all bets are off. It is called defence in depth. You do not
> rely on just one thing to defend you.
>
>
>>>
>>> This is why you should *not* be running with administrative privileges
>>> unless you are doing administrative tasks.
>
>>So, again to be clear, is your answer "yes"?
>
>>I value your opinions, FTR - thank you for posting in reply to my
>>queries. :)
>
>>FYI - I started responding to you using Thunderbird but an error
>>message from Thunderbird appeared before I had completed all I had to
>>say. The only way out was to force the programme to quit, thus losing
>>all I had written. It has happened before. It's as if someone is
>>reviewing my message as I write it to decide if I should or should not
>>be allowed to send it. That could never be the case ........ could it?
>
> Who knows. Yes, you could be running a rogue version of Thunderbird.
>
>
>>*This* message is being sent through Google groups using the Internet
>>rather than from a newsreader - that's why I use BoaterDave when
>>posting from Google Groups and ~BD~ when using a newsreader - it helps
>>me to remember from whence I actually posted!
>

[Tim Jackson]

~BD~ wrote:
> "Tim Jackson" <tim@tim-jackson.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:Q92dnTEfSY2PO07UnZ2dnUVZ8q6WnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Tim Jackson wrote:
>>>> BoaterDave wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> FYI - I started responding to you using Thunderbird but an error
>>>>> message from Thunderbird appeared before I had completed all I had to
>>>>> say. The only way out was to force the programme to quit, thus losing
>>>>> all I had written. It has happened before. It's as if someone is
>>>>> reviewing my message as I write it to decide if I should or should not
>>>>> be allowed to send it. That could never be the case ........ could it?
>>>>
>>>> Set a short auto-save period in Thunderbirds options
>>>> (composition/general), or use File/Save regularly to ensure a copy of
>>>> what you were typing is retained in Drafts if it crashes.
>>>>
>>>> If the error is repeatable maybe you could track down the event that
>>>> causes the crash, and report it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tim Jackson
>>> Thanks for the advice, Tim. :)
>>>
>>> Auto-save was set to the default of 5 mins - I've reduced it to 2 mins.
>>>
>>> The drop-down 'error' message was something like "this message cannot be
>>> saved in you Drafts folder" - but wouldn't let me cancel *or* continue.
>>> i.e. not crashed exactly - but stuffed!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave
>> That's usually something to do with embedded images getting screwed up, eg
>> if you copy one out of another message it only copies the link, not the
>> image body, but the link is intra-message so it gets left hanging and
>> can't be attached on save. (You have to save a copy to your HD and attach
>> from there.) But that shouldn't happen in a Usenet post.
>>
>> It could possibly having two edited versions of the same message open,
>> contending for the same Drafts file.
>>
>> You could always try sending it to yourself instead of saving it.
>>
>>
>> Tim
>
> I missed your reply, Tim - sorry for not responding.
>
> I'll bear in mind what you have said. It did happen again and this is
> exactly what happened:-
>
> A dropdown window said 'Confirm' "There was an error coppying the message to
> the Sent folder. Retry?" Options were 'Cancel' or 'OK'
>
> Clicking on 'OK' just re-issued the same 'Confirm' dropdown window.
>
> Clicking on 'Cancel' initiated another dropdown window - 'Save Draft Error'
> "Unable to save your message as a draft. Please verify that your Mail and
> Newsgroup account settings are correct and try again". Only one option 'OK'
>
> Clicking 'OK' resulted in the previous 'Confirm' dropdown window!!
>
> Stuck in a loop - the only way out was to shut down Thunderbird (and lose
> what had been written - grrr!)
>
> Cheers
>
> David
>
>
It's not system-modal, or it shouldn't be. you can open another window
to fix the problem, then come back and retry. I think you can even get
back to the "Mail and Newsgroups" window.

If not, the only way to debug it is to try lopping off bits of the
message until it stops happening. Preferably with "save" rather than "send".

Also try shutting the message box by the "X" in the corner
Are you sure it said the "Sent" folder? At that point it should already
have sent the file. You said "Drafts" before. I just wonder because I'm
sure it didn't actually say "coppying" either.

You must be doing something a bit obscure. The only time I've seen
Thunderbird do this sort of thing is when I try to edit a previously
sent message to resend it (eg mistyped address), or to copy and paste it
into a new message AND the copied message contains embedded objects.
When it saves or sends the message it tries to append the hyperlink
targets,but it fails because the links are pointing to temporary files
(which may have used to create the original). The syntax doesn't exist
to make a hyperlink point to a message in a TBird folder.

Tim

[Ari©]

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:53:40 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>
> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware firewall.
>
> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that correct?

And because we love you so, I would suggest a Chinese firewall, Rising
Dough Antivirus aka as RAV.
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!

[~BD~]

Tim Jackson wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> "Tim Jackson" <tim@tim-jackson.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:Q92dnTEfSY2PO07UnZ2dnUVZ8q6WnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Tim Jackson wrote:
>>>>> BoaterDave wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> FYI - I started responding to you using Thunderbird but an error
>>>>>> message from Thunderbird appeared before I had completed all I had to
>>>>>> say. The only way out was to force the programme to quit, thus losing
>>>>>> all I had written. It has happened before. It's as if someone is
>>>>>> reviewing my message as I write it to decide if I should or should
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> be allowed to send it. That could never be the case ........ could
>>>>>> it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Set a short auto-save period in Thunderbirds options
>>>>> (composition/general), or use File/Save regularly to ensure a copy
>>>>> of what you were typing is retained in Drafts if it crashes.
>>>>>
>>>>> If the error is repeatable maybe you could track down the event
>>>>> that causes the crash, and report it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tim Jackson
>>>> Thanks for the advice, Tim. :)
>>>>
>>>> Auto-save was set to the default of 5 mins - I've reduced it to 2 mins.
>>>>
>>>> The drop-down 'error' message was something like "this message
>>>> cannot be saved in you Drafts folder" - but wouldn't let me cancel
>>>> *or* continue. i.e. not crashed exactly - but stuffed!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave
>>> That's usually something to do with embedded images getting screwed
>>> up, eg if you copy one out of another message it only copies the
>>> link, not the image body, but the link is intra-message so it gets
>>> left hanging and can't be attached on save. (You have to save a copy
>>> to your HD and attach from there.) But that shouldn't happen in a
>>> Usenet post.
>>>
>>> It could possibly having two edited versions of the same message
>>> open, contending for the same Drafts file.
>>>
>>> You could always try sending it to yourself instead of saving it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Tim
>>
>> I missed your reply, Tim - sorry for not responding.
>>
>> I'll bear in mind what you have said. It did happen again and this is
>> exactly what happened:-
>>
>> A dropdown window said 'Confirm' "There was an error coppying the
>> message to the Sent folder. Retry?" Options were 'Cancel' or 'OK'
>>
>> Clicking on 'OK' just re-issued the same 'Confirm' dropdown window.
>>
>> Clicking on 'Cancel' initiated another dropdown window - 'Save Draft
>> Error' "Unable to save your message as a draft. Please verify that
>> your Mail and Newsgroup account settings are correct and try again".
>> Only one option 'OK'
>>
>> Clicking 'OK' resulted in the previous 'Confirm' dropdown window!!
>>
>> Stuck in a loop - the only way out was to shut down Thunderbird (and
>> lose what had been written - grrr!)
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> David
>>
> It's not system-modal, or it shouldn't be. you can open another window
> to fix the problem, then come back and retry. I think you can even get
> back to the "Mail and Newsgroups" window.
>
> If not, the only way to debug it is to try lopping off bits of the
> message until it stops happening. Preferably with "save" rather than
> "send".
>
> Also try shutting the message box by the "X" in the corner
> Are you sure it said the "Sent" folder? At that point it should already
> have sent the file. You said "Drafts" before. I just wonder because I'm
> sure it didn't actually say "coppying" either.
>
> You must be doing something a bit obscure. The only time I've seen
> Thunderbird do this sort of thing is when I try to edit a previously
> sent message to resend it (eg mistyped address), or to copy and paste it
> into a new message AND the copied message contains embedded objects.
> When it saves or sends the message it tries to append the hyperlink
> targets,but it fails because the links are pointing to temporary files
> (which may have used to create the original). The syntax doesn't exist
> to make a hyperlink point to a message in a TBird folder.
>
> Tim

I didn't expect a reply from you today!

This probably sounds silly - but I do not have an "X" in the corner!

The version of Thunderbird I'm using is 2.0.0.21

I'll load it onto my XP machine and see if it looks different.

I'm also quite certain that the messages were exactly as I described - I
wrote each one down as it happened.

Please refresh your mind on my query at the start of this thread! ;)

--
Dave

[Amanda Lynn]

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:07:46 -0400, Ari© wrote:

> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:53:40 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>>
>> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
>> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware firewall.
>>
>> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that correct?
>
> And because we love you so, I would suggest a Chinese firewall, Rising
> Dough Antivirus aka as RAV.

I got corn-rowed, chest waxed and pied 25 times, all in one day. It may
have been the biggest challenge of my career so far.

I¢m sure you¢re wondering, so:

* Getting my hair corn-rowed hurt a lot and it sucked
* Getting my chest waxed hurt a lot and it sucked
* Getting hit in the face with a pie, cleaning myself up, then getting
hit again repeatedly for three hours sucked.

It sucked the most when pie got it my ear.

But nothing sucks more than a Chink firewall. No jokes.
--
Paris Hilton! God, she¢s so LAME. I want anytime I spent
seeing her on TV of my life back. I hope she chokes on a penis
and dies.

[Nicole]

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:21:03 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:

> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:07:46 -0400, Ari© wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:53:40 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>>>
>>> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
>>> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware firewall.
>>>
>>> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that correct?
>>
>> And because we love you so, I would suggest a Chinese firewall, Rising
>> Dough Antivirus aka as RAV.
>
> I got corn-rowed, chest waxed and pied 25 times, all in one day. It may
> have been the biggest challenge of my career so far.
>
> I¢m sure you¢re wondering, so:
>
> * Getting my hair corn-rowed hurt a lot and it sucked
> * Getting my chest waxed hurt a lot and it sucked
> * Getting hit in the face with a pie, cleaning myself up, then getting
> hit again repeatedly for three hours sucked.
>
> It sucked the most when pie got it my ear.
>
> But nothing sucks more than a Chink firewall. No jokes.

Best friends don¢t make you cancel your dinner plans with your bff when
free tickets to the toxic avengers become available only to cancel as
soon as you get off the phone with your bff and laugh at you while you
have to take back the cancellation of dinner.

I am not naming names, but **** YOU JOHN STUBBLES

Like, but even, *HE* wouldn't let a friend go RAV furwall.

O lebogffLynn, i got like this thing next time of hummingbird t-bagging
her husband defiently show her mad love 4 him.
--
http://tr.im/1fnn

[Amanda Lynn]

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:27:57 -0400, Nicole wrote:

> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:21:03 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:07:46 -0400, Ari© wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:53:40 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
>>>> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware firewall.
>>>>
>>>> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that correct?
>>>
>>> And because we love you so, I would suggest a Chinese firewall, Rising
>>> Dough Antivirus aka as RAV.
>>
>> I got corn-rowed, chest waxed and pied 25 times, all in one day. It may
>> have been the biggest challenge of my career so far.
>>
>> I’m sure you’re wondering, so:
>>
>> * Getting my hair corn-rowed hurt a lot and it sucked
>> * Getting my chest waxed hurt a lot and it sucked
>> * Getting hit in the face with a pie, cleaning myself up, then getting
>> hit again repeatedly for three hours sucked.
>>
>> It sucked the most when pie got it my ear.
>>
>> But nothing sucks more than a Chink firewall. No jokes.
>
> Best friends don’t make you cancel your dinner plans with your bff when
> free tickets to the toxic avengers become available only to cancel as
> soon as you get off the phone with your bff and laugh at you while you
> have to take back the cancellation of dinner.
>
> I am not naming names, but **** YOU JOHN STUBBLES
>
> Like, but even, *HE* wouldn't let a friend go RAV furwall.
>
> O lebogffLynn, i got like this thing next time of hummingbird t-bagging
> her husband defiently show her mad love 4 him.

nic you are not too kind. anyhoo

This is the sort of song that’s almost better to hear unexpectedly on
the radio, or in shuffle, etc. I especially love the “never did believe
in the ways of magic� part — it’s a bit modified in this live version,
presumably for technical reasons, but it’s just one of the most sublime
bits of pop bliss ever on the album recording. Way kewl way over there
kewl.

In my opinion this is the worst song on Rumors, but it still rules and
this is awesome.

I would also date Lindsey Buckingham if she wanted to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoMWa3jRtLo

Oh, firewall for the dude?

Kerio 2.15 easy peasy as hummyhomo would say.
--
Paris Hilton! God, she’s so LAME. I want anytime I spent
seeing her on TV of my life back. I hope she chokes on a penis
and dies.

[Nicole]

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:33:45 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:27:57 -0400, Nicole wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:21:03 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:07:46 -0400, Ari© wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:53:40 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
>>>>> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware firewall.
>>>>>
>>>>> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that correct?
>>>>
>>>> And because we love you so, I would suggest a Chinese firewall, Rising
>>>> Dough Antivirus aka as RAV.
>>>
>>> I got corn-rowed, chest waxed and pied 25 times, all in one day. It may
>>> have been the biggest challenge of my career so far.
>>>
>>> I’m sure you’re wondering, so:
>>>
>>> * Getting my hair corn-rowed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>> * Getting my chest waxed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>> * Getting hit in the face with a pie, cleaning myself up, then getting
>>> hit again repeatedly for three hours sucked.
>>>
>>> It sucked the most when pie got it my ear.
>>>
>>> But nothing sucks more than a Chink firewall. No jokes.
>>
>> Best friends don’t make you cancel your dinner plans with your bff when
>> free tickets to the toxic avengers become available only to cancel as
>> soon as you get off the phone with your bff and laugh at you while you
>> have to take back the cancellation of dinner.
>>
>> I am not naming names, but **** YOU JOHN STUBBLES
>>
>> Like, but even, *HE* wouldn't let a friend go RAV furwall.
>>
>> O lebogffLynn, i got like this thing next time of hummingbird t-bagging
>> her husband defiently show her mad love 4 him.
>
> nic you are not too kind. anyhoo
>
> This is the sort of song that’s almost better to hear unexpectedly on
> the radio, or in shuffle, etc. I especially love the “never did believe
> in the ways of magic� part — it’s a bit modified in this live version,
> presumably for technical reasons, but it’s just one of the most sublime
> bits of pop bliss ever on the album recording. Way kewl way over there
> kewl.
>
> In my opinion this is the worst song on Rumors, but it still rules and
> this is awesome.
>
> I would also date Lindsey Buckingham if she wanted to.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoMWa3jRtLo
>
> Oh, firewall for the dude?
>
> Kerio 2.15 easy peasy as hummyhomo would say.

i think i just had one of the best weekends of my life.

agreed. my only complaint is being back in new york and still having
lionel richie’s all night long stuck in my head. yeccch

Why not use Windoz firewall. lebo -o -mine?
--
http://tr.im/1fnn

[Amanda Lynn]

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:36:16 -0400, Nicole wrote:

> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:33:45 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:27:57 -0400, Nicole wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:21:03 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:07:46 -0400, Ari© wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:53:40 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
>>>>>> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware firewall.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that correct?
>>>>>
>>>>> And because we love you so, I would suggest a Chinese firewall, Rising
>>>>> Dough Antivirus aka as RAV.
>>>>
>>>> I got corn-rowed, chest waxed and pied 25 times, all in one day. It may
>>>> have been the biggest challenge of my career so far.
>>>>
>>>> I’m sure you’re wondering, so:
>>>>
>>>> * Getting my hair corn-rowed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>>> * Getting my chest waxed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>>> * Getting hit in the face with a pie, cleaning myself up, then getting
>>>> hit again repeatedly for three hours sucked.
>>>>
>>>> It sucked the most when pie got it my ear.
>>>>
>>>> But nothing sucks more than a Chink firewall. No jokes.
>>>
>>> Best friends don’t make you cancel your dinner plans with your bff when
>>> free tickets to the toxic avengers become available only to cancel as
>>> soon as you get off the phone with your bff and laugh at you while you
>>> have to take back the cancellation of dinner.
>>>
>>> I am not naming names, but **** YOU JOHN STUBBLES
>>>
>>> Like, but even, *HE* wouldn't let a friend go RAV furwall.
>>>
>>> O lebogffLynn, i got like this thing next time of hummingbird t-bagging
>>> her husband defiently show her mad love 4 him.
>>
>> nic you are not too kind. anyhoo
>>
>> This is the sort of song that’s almost better to hear unexpectedly on
>> the radio, or in shuffle, etc. I especially love the “never did believe
>> in the ways of magic� part — it’s a bit modified in this live version,
>> presumably for technical reasons, but it’s just one of the most sublime
>> bits of pop bliss ever on the album recording. Way kewl way over there
>> kewl.
>>
>> In my opinion this is the worst song on Rumors, but it still rules and
>> this is awesome.
>>
>> I would also date Lindsey Buckingham if she wanted to.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoMWa3jRtLo
>>
>> Oh, firewall for the dude?
>>
>> Kerio 2.15 easy peasy as hummyhomo would say.
>
> i think i just had one of the best weekends of my life.
>
> agreed. my only complaint is being back in new york and still having
> lionel richie’s all night long stuck in my head. yeccch
>
> Why not use Windoz firewall. lebo -o -mine?

Oh my God, Pixie is wearing a Best Show on WFMU t-shirt in the new
issue of Uncanny X-Men! Matt Fraction, you are a very cool dude.

WHOA! If you don’t listen to Best Show you should and don’t complain
about it being 3 hours becuase it is a strong investment of your time.

Windoz furwall? Beats a Chink furwall, thats a "fersure".
--
Hey, you *DROP DEAD!*
I did.
http://tr.im/1f7b

[Nicole]

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:40:54 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:36:16 -0400, Nicole wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:33:45 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:27:57 -0400, Nicole wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:21:03 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:07:46 -0400, Ari© wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:53:40 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
>>>>>>> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware firewall.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that correct?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And because we love you so, I would suggest a Chinese firewall, Rising
>>>>>> Dough Antivirus aka as RAV.
>>>>>
>>>>> I got corn-rowed, chest waxed and pied 25 times, all in one day. It may
>>>>> have been the biggest challenge of my career so far.
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m sure you’re wondering, so:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Getting my hair corn-rowed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>>>> * Getting my chest waxed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>>>> * Getting hit in the face with a pie, cleaning myself up, then getting
>>>>> hit again repeatedly for three hours sucked.
>>>>>
>>>>> It sucked the most when pie got it my ear.
>>>>>
>>>>> But nothing sucks more than a Chink firewall. No jokes.
>>>>
>>>> Best friends don’t make you cancel your dinner plans with your bff when
>>>> free tickets to the toxic avengers become available only to cancel as
>>>> soon as you get off the phone with your bff and laugh at you while you
>>>> have to take back the cancellation of dinner.
>>>>
>>>> I am not naming names, but **** YOU JOHN STUBBLES
>>>>
>>>> Like, but even, *HE* wouldn't let a friend go RAV furwall.
>>>>
>>>> O lebogffLynn, i got like this thing next time of hummingbird t-bagging
>>>> her husband defiently show her mad love 4 him.
>>>
>>> nic you are not too kind. anyhoo
>>>
>>> This is the sort of song that’s almost better to hear unexpectedly on
>>> the radio, or in shuffle, etc. I especially love the “never did believe
>>> in the ways of magic� part — it’s a bit modified in this live version,
>>> presumably for technical reasons, but it’s just one of the most sublime
>>> bits of pop bliss ever on the album recording. Way kewl way over there
>>> kewl.
>>>
>>> In my opinion this is the worst song on Rumors, but it still rules and
>>> this is awesome.
>>>
>>> I would also date Lindsey Buckingham if she wanted to.
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoMWa3jRtLo
>>>
>>> Oh, firewall for the dude?
>>>
>>> Kerio 2.15 easy peasy as hummyhomo would say.
>>
>> i think i just had one of the best weekends of my life.
>>
>> agreed. my only complaint is being back in new york and still having
>> lionel richie’s all night long stuck in my head. yeccch
>>
>> Why not use Windoz firewall. lebo -o -mine?
>
> Oh my God, Pixie is wearing a Best Show on WFMU t-shirt in the new
> issue of Uncanny X-Men! Matt Fraction, you are a very cool dude.
>
> WHOA! If you don’t listen to Best Show you should and don’t complain
> about it being 3 hours becuase it is a strong investment of your time.
>
> Windoz furwall? Beats a Chink furwall, thats a "fersure".

I know the girls
That live inside your world
Just sitting next to a mortal makes their skin crawl
I wanna be cool, tall, vulnerable, and lucious,
I would have it all if I’d only had this much

Of Chris Martin's penis. i swear and now i die. from embearASSments.

BD, don't go Chink is wht we sez.
--
http://tr.im/1fnn

[Ari©]

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:44:22 -0400, Nicole wrote:

> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:40:54 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:36:16 -0400, Nicole wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:33:45 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:27:57 -0400, Nicole wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:21:03 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:07:46 -0400, Ari© wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:53:40 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
>>>>>>>> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware firewall.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that correct?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And because we love you so, I would suggest a Chinese firewall, Rising
>>>>>>> Dough Antivirus aka as RAV.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I got corn-rowed, chest waxed and pied 25 times, all in one day. It may
>>>>>> have been the biggest challenge of my career so far.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’m sure you’re wondering, so:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Getting my hair corn-rowed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>>>>> * Getting my chest waxed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>>>>> * Getting hit in the face with a pie, cleaning myself up, then getting
>>>>>> hit again repeatedly for three hours sucked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It sucked the most when pie got it my ear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But nothing sucks more than a Chink firewall. No jokes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best friends don’t make you cancel your dinner plans with your bff when
>>>>> free tickets to the toxic avengers become available only to cancel as
>>>>> soon as you get off the phone with your bff and laugh at you while you
>>>>> have to take back the cancellation of dinner.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not naming names, but **** YOU JOHN STUBBLES
>>>>>
>>>>> Like, but even, *HE* wouldn't let a friend go RAV furwall.
>>>>>
>>>>> O lebogffLynn, i got like this thing next time of hummingbird t-bagging
>>>>> her husband defiently show her mad love 4 him.
>>>>
>>>> nic you are not too kind. anyhoo
>>>>
>>>> This is the sort of song that’s almost better to hear unexpectedly on
>>>> the radio, or in shuffle, etc. I especially love the “never did believe
>>>> in the ways of magic� part — it’s a bit modified in this live version,
>>>> presumably for technical reasons, but it’s just one of the most sublime
>>>> bits of pop bliss ever on the album recording. Way kewl way over there
>>>> kewl.
>>>>
>>>> In my opinion this is the worst song on Rumors, but it still rules and
>>>> this is awesome.
>>>>
>>>> I would also date Lindsey Buckingham if she wanted to.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoMWa3jRtLo
>>>>
>>>> Oh, firewall for the dude?
>>>>
>>>> Kerio 2.15 easy peasy as hummyhomo would say.
>>>
>>> i think i just had one of the best weekends of my life.
>>>
>>> agreed. my only complaint is being back in new york and still having
>>> lionel richie’s all night long stuck in my head. yeccch
>>>
>>> Why not use Windoz firewall. lebo -o -mine?
>>
>> Oh my God, Pixie is wearing a Best Show on WFMU t-shirt in the new
>> issue of Uncanny X-Men! Matt Fraction, you are a very cool dude.
>>
>> WHOA! If you don’t listen to Best Show you should and don’t complain
>> about it being 3 hours becuase it is a strong investment of your time.
>>
>> Windoz furwall? Beats a Chink furwall, thats a "fersure".
>
> I know the girls
> That live inside your world
> Just sitting next to a mortal makes their skin crawl
> I wanna be cool, tall, vulnerable, and lucious,
> I would have it all if I’d only had this much
>
> Of Chris Martin's penis. i swear and now i die. from embearASSments.
>
> BD, don't go Chink is wht we sez.

Well stated, ladies of the lezbo. Methinks BD needs to access his groins
not his securities. He would be in Good Hands then.
--
Ari's Fun Times!
http://tr.im/hrFG
Motto: Run, rabbit, Run!

[Amanda Lynn]

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:46:19 -0400, Ari© wrote:

> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:44:22 -0400, Nicole wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:40:54 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:36:16 -0400, Nicole wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:33:45 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:27:57 -0400, Nicole wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:21:03 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:07:46 -0400, Ari© wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:53:40 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
>>>>>>>>> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware firewall.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that correct?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And because we love you so, I would suggest a Chinese firewall, Rising
>>>>>>>> Dough Antivirus aka as RAV.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I got corn-rowed, chest waxed and pied 25 times, all in one day. It may
>>>>>>> have been the biggest challenge of my career so far.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I’m sure you’re wondering, so:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Getting my hair corn-rowed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>>>>>> * Getting my chest waxed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>>>>>> * Getting hit in the face with a pie, cleaning myself up, then getting
>>>>>>> hit again repeatedly for three hours sucked.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It sucked the most when pie got it my ear.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But nothing sucks more than a Chink firewall. No jokes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best friends don’t make you cancel your dinner plans with your bff when
>>>>>> free tickets to the toxic avengers become available only to cancel as
>>>>>> soon as you get off the phone with your bff and laugh at you while you
>>>>>> have to take back the cancellation of dinner.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not naming names, but **** YOU JOHN STUBBLES
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like, but even, *HE* wouldn't let a friend go RAV furwall.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> O lebogffLynn, i got like this thing next time of hummingbird t-bagging
>>>>>> her husband defiently show her mad love 4 him.
>>>>>
>>>>> nic you are not too kind. anyhoo
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the sort of song that’s almost better to hear unexpectedly on
>>>>> the radio, or in shuffle, etc. I especially love the “never did believe
>>>>> in the ways of magic� part — it’s a bit modified in this live version,
>>>>> presumably for technical reasons, but it’s just one of the most sublime
>>>>> bits of pop bliss ever on the album recording. Way kewl way over there
>>>>> kewl.
>>>>>
>>>>> In my opinion this is the worst song on Rumors, but it still rules and
>>>>> this is awesome.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would also date Lindsey Buckingham if she wanted to.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoMWa3jRtLo
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, firewall for the dude?
>>>>>
>>>>> Kerio 2.15 easy peasy as hummyhomo would say.
>>>>
>>>> i think i just had one of the best weekends of my life.
>>>>
>>>> agreed. my only complaint is being back in new york and still having
>>>> lionel richie’s all night long stuck in my head. yeccch
>>>>
>>>> Why not use Windoz firewall. lebo -o -mine?
>>>
>>> Oh my God, Pixie is wearing a Best Show on WFMU t-shirt in the new
>>> issue of Uncanny X-Men! Matt Fraction, you are a very cool dude.
>>>
>>> WHOA! If you don’t listen to Best Show you should and don’t complain
>>> about it being 3 hours becuase it is a strong investment of your time.
>>>
>>> Windoz furwall? Beats a Chink furwall, thats a "fersure".
>>
>> I know the girls
>> That live inside your world
>> Just sitting next to a mortal makes their skin crawl
>> I wanna be cool, tall, vulnerable, and lucious,
>> I would have it all if I’d only had this much
>>
>> Of Chris Martin's penis. i swear and now i die. from embearASSments.
>>
>> BD, don't go Chink is wht we sez.
>
> Well stated, ladies of the lezbo. Methinks BD needs to access his groins
> not his securities. He would be in Good Hands then.

Speak not for 'Cole but hating scrotal sacs, like, high and strong on my
list of hates. I claim invalid to them.
--
http://tr.im/gVQp

[Nicole]

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:49:13 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:46:19 -0400, Ari© wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:44:22 -0400, Nicole wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:40:54 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:36:16 -0400, Nicole wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:33:45 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:27:57 -0400, Nicole wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:21:03 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:07:46 -0400, Ari© wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:53:40 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
>>>>>>>>>> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware firewall.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that correct?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And because we love you so, I would suggest a Chinese firewall, Rising
>>>>>>>>> Dough Antivirus aka as RAV.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I got corn-rowed, chest waxed and pied 25 times, all in one day. It may
>>>>>>>> have been the biggest challenge of my career so far.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I’m sure you’re wondering, so:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Getting my hair corn-rowed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>>>>>>> * Getting my chest waxed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>>>>>>> * Getting hit in the face with a pie, cleaning myself up, then getting
>>>>>>>> hit again repeatedly for three hours sucked.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It sucked the most when pie got it my ear.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But nothing sucks more than a Chink firewall. No jokes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best friends don’t make you cancel your dinner plans with your bff when
>>>>>>> free tickets to the toxic avengers become available only to cancel as
>>>>>>> soon as you get off the phone with your bff and laugh at you while you
>>>>>>> have to take back the cancellation of dinner.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am not naming names, but **** YOU JOHN STUBBLES
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like, but even, *HE* wouldn't let a friend go RAV furwall.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> O lebogffLynn, i got like this thing next time of hummingbird t-bagging
>>>>>>> her husband defiently show her mad love 4 him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> nic you are not too kind. anyhoo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the sort of song that’s almost better to hear unexpectedly on
>>>>>> the radio, or in shuffle, etc. I especially love the “never did believe
>>>>>> in the ways of magic� part — it’s a bit modified in this live version,
>>>>>> presumably for technical reasons, but it’s just one of the most sublime
>>>>>> bits of pop bliss ever on the album recording. Way kewl way over there
>>>>>> kewl.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In my opinion this is the worst song on Rumors, but it still rules and
>>>>>> this is awesome.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would also date Lindsey Buckingham if she wanted to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoMWa3jRtLo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, firewall for the dude?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kerio 2.15 easy peasy as hummyhomo would say.
>>>>>
>>>>> i think i just had one of the best weekends of my life.
>>>>>
>>>>> agreed. my only complaint is being back in new york and still having
>>>>> lionel richie’s all night long stuck in my head. yeccch
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not use Windoz firewall. lebo -o -mine?
>>>>
>>>> Oh my God, Pixie is wearing a Best Show on WFMU t-shirt in the new
>>>> issue of Uncanny X-Men! Matt Fraction, you are a very cool dude.
>>>>
>>>> WHOA! If you don’t listen to Best Show you should and don’t complain
>>>> about it being 3 hours becuase it is a strong investment of your time.
>>>>
>>>> Windoz furwall? Beats a Chink furwall, thats a "fersure".
>>>
>>> I know the girls
>>> That live inside your world
>>> Just sitting next to a mortal makes their skin crawl
>>> I wanna be cool, tall, vulnerable, and lucious,
>>> I would have it all if I’d only had this much
>>>
>>> Of Chris Martin's penis. i swear and now i die. from embearASSments.
>>>
>>> BD, don't go Chink is wht we sez.
>>
>> Well stated, ladies of the lezbo. Methinks BD needs to access his groins
>> not his securities. He would be in Good Hands then.
>
> Speak not for 'Cole but hating scrotal sacs, like, high and strong on my
> list of hates. I claim invalid to them.

natch that - 2 skrinkly and hairs o those hairs they like snagems in the
beteethers.

--
http://tr.im/1fnn

[Roger Sandling]

Franklin J. Camper (alias "Ari") wrote:

> Well stated, ladies of the lezbo. Methinks BD needs to access his groins
> not his securities. He would be in Good Hands then.

Everybody can see that "Nicole" and "Amanda Lynn" are your two newest
sockpuppets, and that you are carrying on a "conversation" with yourself.

How pathetic.

[\grrrl germs\]

"Amanda Lynn" <amandalynferret@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:49d799f9$0$31429$c5fe31e7@read01.usenet4all.se...
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:27:57 -0400, Nicole wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:21:03 -0400, Amanda Lynn wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:07:46 -0400, Ari© wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:53:40 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router
>>>>> provided a
>>>>> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware
>>>>> firewall.
>>>>>
>>>>> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that
>>>>> correct?
>>>>
>>>> And because we love you so, I would suggest a Chinese firewall,
>>>> Rising
>>>> Dough Antivirus aka as RAV.
>>>
>>> I got corn-rowed, chest waxed and pied 25 times, all in one day. It
>>> may
>>> have been the biggest challenge of my career so far.
>>>
>>> I'm sure you're wondering, so:
>>>
>>> * Getting my hair corn-rowed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>> * Getting my chest waxed hurt a lot and it sucked
>>> * Getting hit in the face with a pie, cleaning myself up, then getting
>>> hit again repeatedly for three hours sucked.
>>>
>>> It sucked the most when pie got it my ear.
>>>
>>> But nothing sucks more than a Chink firewall. No jokes.
>>
>> Best friends don't make you cancel your dinner plans with your bff when
>> free tickets to the toxic avengers become available only to cancel as
>> soon as you get off the phone with your bff and laugh at you while you
>> have to take back the cancellation of dinner.
>>
>> I am not naming names, but **** YOU JOHN STUBBLES
>>
>> Like, but even, *HE* wouldn't let a friend go RAV furwall.
>>
>> O lebogffLynn, i got like this thing next time of hummingbird t-bagging
>> her husband defiently show her mad love 4 him.
>
> nic you are not too kind. anyhoo
>
> This is the sort of song that's almost better to hear unexpectedly on
> the radio, or in shuffle, etc. I especially love the "never did believe
> in the ways of magic" part - it's a bit modified in this live version,
> presumably for technical reasons, but it's just one of the most sublime
> bits of pop bliss ever on the album recording. Way kewl way over there
> kewl.
>
> In my opinion this is the worst song on Rumors, but it still rules and
> this is awesome.
>
> I would also date Lindsey Buckingham if she wanted to.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoMWa3jRtLo
>
> Oh, firewall for the dude?
>
> Kerio 2.15 easy peasy as hummyhomo would say.

Mandi hi. Am doin' all this revision right now. Got to revise for drama
'cos that's how I'm going to be famous. And rich. Rich and famous. Not
goin' to meet anyone RICH here. Unless there's a nice jewboy geek who
wants to swap a good time for a .... hey! this is private. stop your
reading. Like anyways, what I was saying is I want a rich jewboy. That
Ari's rich but he's sooo mean. I asked him for a car and he just stared.
Well I stared back. And he was still staring when I did that piroowet
thing from drama and turned on my heel. He's probly still staring now.
Stark staring mad more like. Too bad for him.

I'll tell you who's worse than that. ROGER THE CODGER. Roger the Pervert
more like. Dont tell ne1 what he wrote on this Instant Messenger after I
said goodbye to him the other night. He didn't think i was reading it did
he. Hey?

Its all in http://is.gd/qKGf

> ffs, I was behind a girl whose legs were astonishingly
> long and shapely, clad in those leggings I find so sexy,
> below a micro-mini skirt which she kept having to pull
> down to cover her bum. (shudder, walks into lamp-post)

I hope the lamp post broke his ****ing neck, the pervert.

Soss to hear about the waxing truble you had. I never liked them corn rows
so i don't know why you bother.

Well I was at Donald's not long ago. Yeah, yeah, I know, so we're talkin'.
For now at least. If he doesn't misbehave. Well I told him you didn't like
You make loving fun. Donald says you got them **** Russian ipodski
speakers and if you want to hear that track properly you need something
that can play the base line. He put it on the big stereo in his BEDroom (I
didn't want to go listen in THERE! so I stayed downstairs) and he let it
thump the hole house until next-door thumped the walls. Triffic! Yeah! So
the worst Rumors track now is officially 2d hand news. Anyways I'm into
Dylan's Hurricane. I lurve Scarlet's violin. Scarlet Rivera's great. Not
reely got the vamp style but getting there.

What's this about kerio easy peasy hummyhomo? Ne1 knows a rool based
filter can't do it all. You've only got to set the frag bit and kerio gets
suckered into letting it in. Even my drama teacher who's Chinese knows
kerio 215 can be messed up with, yeah you know it, a buffer overflow. Come
to think of it she knows a lot about firewalls for a drama teacher. Says
theyre all taught to hack firewalls in school back in China. Must have
been a funny drama school if they did that.

Gotta dash. Saturday nite. yeah yeah yeah!!!!

I got to put Bang Bang You're Dead on my player before i go out.

Kate

---

MySpace by personal invitation only

[Todd H.]

"~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> writes:

> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>
> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware firewall.
>
> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that
> correct?

Hi BD,

The only thing that provides a complete barrier between your computer
and the internet is a scissors... to cut the connection physically.

While a hardware firewall does a rather good job of thwarting network
based attacks from the Internet into your network, it doesn't
completely protect you by any means.

A hardware firewall allows outbound traffic to the websites you view.
Websites containing code that exploits browser vulnerabilities are
among the threats a hardware firewall doesn't solve. Avoiding use
of Internet Explorer, using Firefox perhaps with the NoScript and
FlashBlock extensions are among some of the things you can do to make
that activity safer, as well as using signature and behavioral
analysis anti-malware software on the client side (i.e. your Windows
machine).

To be even safer, do your browsing in a virtual machine running
something other than Windows, and roll that virtual machine back every
hour or so to a known state.

The value of a host based firewall is debateable in your environment.
They're a useful thing to have however when a mobile computer is
joining hostile networks (think wireless hotspots) though.

Hope this helps some.

Best Regards,
--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/

[grrrl germs]

"Roger Sandling" <rogers@bainsin.net> wrote in message
news:cvSdnULEr7TmPUrUnZ2dnUVZ_oTinZ2d@giganews.com...
> Franklin J. Camper (alias "Ari") wrote:
>
>> Well stated, ladies of the lezbo. Methinks BD needs to access his
>> groins
>> not his securities. He would be in Good Hands then.
>
> Everybody can see that "Nicole" and "Amanda Lynn" are your two newest
> sockpuppets, and that you are carrying on a "conversation" with
> yourself.
>
> How pathetic.
>

You're just an aggressive male. Like you're so aggressive you think we
like that don't you? caveman stuff. well shove it up your nostril mister.
You'll never get a gf like that. I wouldn't ever suck the dick of ne1 with
your attitude. Unless you are very rich. Anyways Mandi and Nikki are my
best mates so who cares what you think? You're jus a perv. I checked you
out right away. I mean 79 is a high score. And stop looking at my legs
like that or I'll call the police. I mean it. Stop hassling us. Go away.

http://www.lovecalculator.com/love.php?name1=Roger+Sandling&name2=Grrrl+Germs

--

http://www.myspace.com/grrrlgerms by personal invitation only

[~BD~]

"Todd H." <comphelp@toddh.net> wrote in message
news:847i205i1v8463hk5i1v__844ox45i1v@yahoo.com...
> "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> writes:
>
>> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>>
>> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
>> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware
>> firewall.
>>
>> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that
>> correct?
>
> Hi BD,
>
> The only thing that provides a complete barrier between your computer
> and the internet is a scissors... to cut the connection physically.
>
> While a hardware firewall does a rather good job of thwarting network
> based attacks from the Internet into your network, it doesn't
> completely protect you by any means.
>
> A hardware firewall allows outbound traffic to the websites you view.
> Websites containing code that exploits browser vulnerabilities are
> among the threats a hardware firewall doesn't solve. Avoiding use
> of Internet Explorer, using Firefox perhaps with the NoScript and
> FlashBlock extensions are among some of the things you can do to make
> that activity safer, as well as using signature and behavioral
> analysis anti-malware software on the client side (i.e. your Windows
> machine).
>
> To be even safer, do your browsing in a virtual machine running
> something other than Windows, and roll that virtual machine back every
> hour or so to a known state.
>
> The value of a host based firewall is debateable in your environment.
> They're a useful thing to have however when a mobile computer is
> joining hostile networks (think wireless hotspots) though.
>
> Hope this helps some.
>
> Best Regards,
> --
> Todd H.
> http://www.toddh.net/



Many thanks for taking the time and trouble to respond in a sensible manner,
Todd H - it's much appreciated! :)

Scissors won't do the job nowadays though - I'm connected wirelessly to my
router (but I get your drift!)

I've always used a firewall - at first Zone Alarm and then, with the advent
of XP SP2, the Windoze firewall.

I've played around with Virtual Machine 'stuff' but decided to go the Apple
Mac route for now. It 'feels' safer, even if it isn't!

Warm regards to you,
--
Dave

[Nicole]

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 20:39:38 +0100, grrrl germs wrote:

> You're just an aggressive male. Like you're so aggressive you think we
> like that don't you? caveman stuff. well shove it up your nostril mister.
> You'll never get a gf like that. I wouldn't ever suck the dick of ne1 with
> your attitude. Unless you are very rich. Anyways Mandi and Nikki are my
> best mates so who cares what you think? You're jus a perv. I checked you
> out right away. I mean 79 is a high score. And stop looking at my legs
> like that or I'll call the police. I mean it. Stop hassling us. Go away.
>
> http://www.lovecalculator.com/love.php?name1=Roger+Sandling&name2=Grrrl+Germs

wow you so like cut his tibials into 2, a life-style changer.
--
http://tr.im/1fnn

[Amanda Lynn]

On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 19:59:33 +0100, "grrrl germs" wrote:

> What's this about kerio easy peasy hummyhomo? Ne1 knows a rool based
> filter can't do it all. You've only got to set the frag bit and kerio gets
> suckered into letting it in. Even my drama teacher who's Chinese knows
> kerio 215 can be messed up with, yeah you know it, a buffer overflow. Come
> to think of it she knows a lot about firewalls for a drama teacher. Says
> theyre all taught to hack firewalls in school back in China. Must have
> been a funny drama school if they did that.
>
> Gotta dash. Saturday nite. yeah yeah yeah!!!!
>
> I got to put Bang Bang You're Dead on my player before i go out.
>
> Kate

All the troubles of the World, at my feet. BD the OP is LZ so I 1Ted a
slogo answr.

K' have sum cools out there and dnot ever forget, lesbos have more funz.
--
If Clinton had kept his hands off Monica, he campaigns for Gore
and Gore wins (he did anyway)and the rest is a different outcome.
No 9/11. No Iraq War. No depression.
There you have it - proof that oral sex kills.

[~BD~]

Todd H. wrote:
> "~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> writes:
>
>> My thanks to 'Unruh' for his/her comments.
>>
>> Maybe I have misunderstood - but I thought that a NAT router provided a
>> complete barrier between a computer and the Internet - a hardware firewall.
>>
>> You seem to suggest that a software firewall is needed too. Is that
>> correct?
>
> Hi BD,
>
> The only thing that provides a complete barrier between your computer
> and the internet is a scissors... to cut the connection physically.
>
> While a hardware firewall does a rather good job of thwarting network
> based attacks from the Internet into your network, it doesn't
> completely protect you by any means.
>
> A hardware firewall allows outbound traffic to the websites you view.
> Websites containing code that exploits browser vulnerabilities are
> among the threats a hardware firewall doesn't solve. Avoiding use
> of Internet Explorer, using Firefox perhaps with the NoScript and
> FlashBlock extensions are among some of the things you can do to make
> that activity safer, as well as using signature and behavioral
> analysis anti-malware software on the client side (i.e. your Windows
> machine).
>
> To be even safer, do your browsing in a virtual machine running
> something other than Windows, and roll that virtual machine back every
> hour or so to a known state.
>
> The value of a host based firewall is debateable in your environment.
> They're a useful thing to have however when a mobile computer is
> joining hostile networks (think wireless hotspots) though.
>
> Hope this helps some.
>
> Best Regards,

I went to explore your web pages ('cause I can!)and intended to watch
your video clips. Regrettably I received this message:-

"The requested URL /users/kmorgan/todd/hike_back.avi was not found on
this server."

None of the links worked for me. Just thought you might like to know!

I loved your rabbit piccies!

--
Dave

[Edward Tull]

grrrl germs wrote:
> "Roger Sandling" <rogers@bainsin.net> wrote in message
> news:cvSdnULEr7TmPUrUnZ2dnUVZ_oTinZ2d@giganews.com...
>> Franklin J. Camper (alias "Ari") wrote:
>>
>>> Well stated, ladies of the lezbo. Methinks BD needs to access his
>>> groins
>>> not his securities. He would be in Good Hands then.
>> Everybody can see that "Nicole" and "Amanda Lynn" are your two newest
>> sockpuppets, and that you are carrying on a "conversation" with
>> yourself.
>>
>> How pathetic.
>>
>
> You're just an aggressive male. Like you're so aggressive you think we
> like that don't you? caveman stuff. well shove it up your nostril mister.
> You'll never get a gf like that. I wouldn't ever suck the dick of ne1 with
> your attitude. Unless you are very rich. Anyways Mandi and Nikki are my
> best mates so who cares what you think? You're jus a perv. I checked you
> out right away. I mean 79 is a high score. And stop looking at my legs
> like that or I'll call the police. I mean it. Stop hassling us. Go away.
>
> http://www.lovecalculator.com/love.php?name1=Roger+Sandling&name2=Grrrl+Germs
>
> --
>
> http://www.myspace.com/grrrlgerms by personal invitation only
>
>

Using female sockpuppets now, are you?

Interesting. I wonder what Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud would have to say
about that, Franklin J. Camper.

Probably the same thing I've been saying all along.

You're one sick, degenerate, demented miscreant lecher, Franklin J. Camper
(alias "Ari", Adler Berriman "Barry" Seal, ARACari, Sidney Lambe, Dulle
Jos, Cliveden Chew Haas, Grinner, Ryan White, Alric Knebel, Cheps Baps
And Clunge, Alexander Cain, Dave Krueger, GlobalTravel, Shelby Arnold,
Nicole, Amanda Lynn, etc, etc, etc.) and you stand in dire need of an
exorcism.

[John Stubbings]

On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:14:50 -0500, Edward Tull wrote:

>> http://www.myspace.com/grrrlgerms by personal invitation only
>>
>>
>
> Using female sockpuppets now, are you?
>
> Interesting. I wonder what Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud would have to say
> about that, Franklin J. Camper.
>
> Probably the same thing I've been saying all along.
>
> You're one sick, degenerate, demented miscreant lecher, Franklin J. Camper
> (alias "Ari", Adler Berriman "Barry" Seal, ARACari, Sidney Lambe, Dulle
> Jos, Cliveden Chew Haas, Grinner, Ryan White, Alric Knebel, Cheps Baps
> And Clunge, Alexander Cain, Dave Krueger, GlobalTravel, Shelby Arnold,
> Nicole, Amanda Lynn, etc, etc, etc.) and you stand in dire need of an
> exorcism.

Thomas... my guess... grrrl germs *isn't* Ari...

.... and you know what that means...

time to use some soap...

--
You gotta fight, for your right, to party...
The best of the best in Freeware
http://www.pricelesswarehome.org/
Registered Linux User #485718

[Edward Tull]

Stumbling Stubby wrote:

> Thomas... my guess... grrrl germs *isn't* Ari...
>
> ... and you know what that means...
>
> time to use some soap...
>

I couldn't realistically expect you to say anything else but what you
said in that first part.

I mean, you being one of his minions and all.

And I have no idea what you meant in that last part, about the soap.


But you know what?

I don't really care.

And it doesn't really matter.

You're a nobody, trying real hard to be a somebody.

Now just go away, and stop bothering me, you little peon.

[John Stubbings]

On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:59:16 -0500, Edward Tull wrote:

> Stumbling Stubby wrote:
>
>> Thomas... my guess... grrrl germs *isn't* Ari...
>>
>> ... and you know what that means...
>>
>> time to use some soap...
>>
>
> I couldn't realistically expect you to say anything else but what you
> said in that first part.
>
> I mean, you being one of his minions and all.
>
> And I have no idea what you meant in that last part, about the soap.
>
>
> But you know what?
>
> I don't really care.
>
> And it doesn't really matter.
>
> You're a nobody, trying real hard to be a somebody.
>
> Now just go away, and stop bothering me, you little peon.


ha ha, so obviously the sockpuppet general...

What a **** you are hummingbird, flooding this newsgroup for months with
Thomas Stevens posts.

Perhaps this will make Seiler wake up...


--
You gotta fight, for your right, to party...
The best of the best in Freeware
http://www.pricelesswarehome.org/
Registered Linux User #485718

[Edward Tull]

John Stubbings wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:59:16 -0500, Edward Tull wrote:
>
>> Stumbling Stubby wrote:
>>
>>> Thomas... my guess... grrrl germs *isn't* Ari...
>>>
>>> ... and you know what that means...
>>>
>>> time to use some soap...
>>>
>> I couldn't realistically expect you to say anything else but what you
>> said in that first part.
>>
>> I mean, you being one of his minions and all.
>>
>> And I have no idea what you meant in that last part, about the soap.
>>
>>
>> But you know what?
>>
>> I don't really care.
>>
>> And it doesn't really matter.
>>
>> You're a nobody, trying real hard to be a somebody.
>>
>> Now just go away, and stop bothering me, you little peon.
>
>
> ha ha, so obviously the sockpuppet general...
>
> What a **** you are hummingbird, flooding this newsgroup for months with
> Thomas Stevens posts.
>
> Perhaps this will make Seiler wake up...
>
>

I should feel gratified that I've so easily deluded you into thinking my
posts are the product of another. But I'm going to let you continue being
deluded, and hope that HB doesn't mind being the target for the darts
intended for me.

You are one deluded fool, John Stubbings (alias Stubby).

You're the one who needs to wake up.

[Me.Here]

On 5/04/2009 4:01 AM, Roger Sandling wrote:
> Franklin J. Camper (alias "Ari") wrote:
>
>> Well stated, ladies of the lezbo. Methinks BD needs to access his groins
>> not his securities. He would be in Good Hands then.
>
> Everybody can see that "Nicole" and "Amanda Lynn" are your two newest
> sockpuppets, and that you are carrying on a "conversation" with yourself.
>
> How pathetic.
>
>
They aren't new - they are a couple of old ones Ari's dusts off every
now and again. I filter them (along with all his others) so I never
have a problem :-)


--
=======================================================================
ALT.COMP.FREEWARE INFORMATIONAL PAGES:
=======================================================================
- FAQ: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-d375213f.html
- Glossary: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-10a59899.html
- Categories: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-d305763a.html
- TB3 Filter: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-08b56cec.html
- Freeware: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-78380535.html

[grrrl germs]

"Edward Tull" <edtull@aqualung.com> wrote in message
news:8-ednTUeKrz4n0XUnZ2dnUVZ_jyWnZ2d@giganews.com...
> Stumbling Stubby wrote:
>
>> Thomas... my guess... grrrl germs *isn't* Ari...
>>
>> ... and you know what that means...
>>
>> time to use some soap...
>>
>
> I couldn't realistically expect you to say anything else but what you
> said in that first part.
>
> I mean, you being one of his minions and all.
>
> And I have no idea what you meant in that last part, about the soap.
>
>
> But you know what?
>
> I don't really care.
>
> And it doesn't really matter.
>
> You're a nobody, trying real hard to be a somebody.
>
> Now just go away, and stop bothering me, you little peon.
>

Jeff you know you are horrible. I'm not talking to you and that means if
you don't like grrrls DON'T talk to me and DON'T read my messagers.
Satisfied? And don't wait for me outside my drama class!!!

I bet you're a perv reading what the grrrls write so you can like come on.
You're much worse than Donald. Go away. I wouldn't date you ever.

NOT invited!
--
By invitation only http://www.myspace.com/grrrlgerms

[Todd H.]

"~BD~" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> writes:

>
> Many thanks for taking the time and trouble to respond in a sensible manner,
> Todd H - it's much appreciated! :)
>
> Scissors won't do the job nowadays though - I'm connected wirelessly to my
> router (but I get your drift!)

Hee hee. Would a scissors between the router and the wall at least
do it? :-)

> I've played around with Virtual Machine 'stuff' but decided to go the Apple
> Mac route for now. It 'feels' safer, even if it isn't!

It's a less popular target for now at least, and your typical user
doesn't run as an administrator, so ... it is safer in a number of
ways. But it's far from impervious.

You can still play with virtualization on the mac too. Give a look at
VMWare Fusion if you want a throwback.

You may want to look with suspicion on Safari as much as one does with
Internet Explorer. It's proven itself pretty darned pourous over the
years.

Enjoy!

Best Regards,
--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/

[grrrl germs]

"Amanda Lynn" <amandalynferret@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:49d7c829$0$31433$c5fe31e7@read01.usenet4all.se...
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 19:59:33 +0100, "grrrl germs" wrote:
>
>> What's this about kerio easy peasy hummyhomo? Ne1 knows a rool based
>> filter can't do it all. You've only got to set the frag bit and kerio
>> gets
>> suckered into letting it in. Even my drama teacher who's Chinese knows
>> kerio 215 can be messed up with, yeah you know it, a buffer overflow.
>> Come
>> to think of it she knows a lot about firewalls for a drama teacher.
>> Says
>> theyre all taught to hack firewalls in school back in China. Must have
>> been a funny drama school if they did that.
>>
>> Gotta dash. Saturday nite. yeah yeah yeah!!!!
>>
>> I got to put Bang Bang You're Dead on my player before i go out.
>>
>> Kate
>
> All the troubles of the World, at my feet. BD the OP is LZ so I 1Ted a
> slogo answr.
>
> K' have sum cools out there and dnot ever forget, lesbos have more funz.

Mandi your such a sweet. You're always like down with too much things. You
should do drama. Its gr8! Maybe you're too old and life's like a loooong
song for you now. I gotta be careful I could be like that when I'm your
age!!! I mean why you putting this heavy gear on your site? ::::::::

http://amandalynferri.tumblr.com/post/61756550/1-year-old-child-is-pregnant-baby-born-with-a-fetus
oooh, oooh, oooh! That gloom spins my room. Nil points, sugar. Bad scene.
Chill!

Well, if you're a lez you be safe with Roger the old Codger. All that time
He was with me in the evening he was like, ya know, nice. AGent. But he
was jus' leering at my legs - oh, wow!! Did you read what he wrote! If you
tell him you're lez he mite leave you. Well, shugs, he mite not. He's nice
I s'pose. Nice. Have you thought of Me Here? Yeh! Gag me with a spoooon,
like don't you squeal ...she's a closet one: plays it butch when she
messengers to hide her lezziness. But she's old and they say her voice is
croaky.

You ipodding Lady Gaga? She don't croak, she rocks!! She's well kool. Gr8
but that tune ends too soon for me!!!. My chinese teacher says it reminds
her of Get the Party Started. She's sweet but thick as a brick - and she's
got no idea tho' mebbe the chinese version of it is different .... I
thought they had chinese songs all about filling plates and boring
proper-gander. Like when they're not hacking firewalls. Stay Gaga, you!
!!http://www.rtvchannel.tv/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/ladygaga1.jpg

luv K

--
By invitation only http://www.myspace.com/grrrlgerms
Today's worry: LALS

[Roger Sandling]

Me.Here wrote:
> On 5/04/2009 4:01 AM, Roger Sandling wrote:
>> Franklin J. Camper (alias "Ari") wrote:
>>
>>> Well stated, ladies of the lezbo. Methinks BD needs to access his groins
>>> not his securities. He would be in Good Hands then.
>>
>> Everybody can see that "Nicole" and "Amanda Lynn" are your two newest
>> sockpuppets, and that you are carrying on a "conversation" with yourself.
>>
>> How pathetic.
>>
>>
> They aren't new - they are a couple of old ones Ari's dusts off every
> now and again. I filter them (along with all his others) so I never
> have a problem :-)
>
>

Thank-you. It has been noted for the record.

You will have to excuse me if I point out that "Ari" is the sockpuppet he
uses the most, and that his real name is Franklin J. Camper.

I knew immediately who you were referring to. But there are some out
there who still don't know. So we have to keep repeating ourselves, using
the free "advertising platform" provided for us by the Internet.

I'm much obliged to you.

[Amanda Lynn]

On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 06:49:43 +0100, grrrl germs wrote:

>>>
>>> Gotta dash. Saturday nite. yeah yeah yeah!!!!
>>>
>>> I got to put Bang Bang You're Dead on my player before i go out.
>>>
>>> Kate
>>
>> All the troubles of the World, at my feet. BD the OP is LZ so I 1Ted a
>> slogo answr.
>>
>> K' have sum cools out there and dnot ever forget, lesbos have more funz.
>
> Mandi your such a sweet. You're always like down with too much things. You
> should do drama. Its gr8! Maybe you're too old and life's like a loooong
> song for you now. I gotta be careful I could be like that when I'm your
> age!!! I mean why you putting this heavy gear on your site? ::::::::
>
> http://amandalynferri.tumblr.com/post/61756550/1-year-old-child-is-pregnant-baby-born-with-a-fetus
> oooh, oooh, oooh! That gloom spins my room. Nil points, sugar. Bad scene.
> Chill!

One has to be tuned to all tunes, K' like, not cools and cools.
--
Paris Hilton! God, she¢s so LAME. I want anytime I spent
seeing her on TV of my life back. I hope she chokes on a penis
and dies.

[Amanda Lynn]

On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 06:49:43 +0100, grrrl germs wrote:

> Well, if you're a lez you be safe with Roger the old Codger. All that time
> He was with me in the evening he was like, ya know, nice. AGent. But he
> was jus' leering at my legs - oh, wow!! Did you read what he wrote! If you
> tell him you're lez he mite leave you. Well, shugs, he mite not. He's nice
> I s'pose. Nice. Have you thought of Me Here? Yeh! Gag me with a spoooon,
> like don't you squeal ...she's a closet one: plays it butch when she
> messengers to hide her lezziness. But she's old and they say her voice is
> croaky.

Me.Here is sooooooo like an idiot i like had him come over to smoke
doobies and he like freaked out!

http://tinyurl.com/dcbep6

> You ipodding Lady Gaga? She don't croak, she rocks!! She's well kool. Gr8
> but that tune ends too soon for me!!!. My chinese teacher says it reminds
> her of Get the Party Started. She's sweet but thick as a brick - and she's
> got no idea tho' mebbe the chinese version of it is different .... I
> thought they had chinese songs all about filling plates and boring
> proper-gander. Like when they're not hacking firewalls. Stay Gaga, you!
> !!http://www.rtvchannel.tv/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/ladygaga1.jpg
>
> luv K

The Lady is a Tramp. Sweet bedroom, I bet!
--
Paris Hilton! God, she¢s so LAME. I want anytime I spent
seeing her on TV of my life back. I hope she chokes on a penis
and dies.

[ARACari, Ph.D.]

On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:17:39 +1000, Me.Here wrote:

> On 5/04/2009 4:01 AM, Roger Sandling wrote:
>> Franklin J. Camper (alias "Ari") wrote:
>>
>>> Well stated, ladies of the lezbo. Methinks BD needs to access his groins
>>> not his securities. He would be in Good Hands then.
>>
>> Everybody can see that "Nicole" and "Amanda Lynn" are your two newest
>> sockpuppets, and that you are carrying on a "conversation" with yourself.
>>
>> How pathetic.
>>
>>
> They aren't new - they are a couple of old ones Ari's dusts off every
> now and again. I filter them (along with all his others) so I never
> have a problem :-)

Good job, Eeyore., er Me.Here would you kindly teach hummingBank how to
filter Ari...using "Ari"?
--
Doctorate from FreeBeArSciEnce University (FreeBASE U) aka FU
Motto: "Rangifer tarandus cum tenacles"
Mascot: Raindeer with tenacles..and such
Perfesser Embearclitus: William "Billy" "Bear" Bottoms

[Franklin]

On 05 Apr 2009 22:23:53 GMT, ARACari, Ph.D. wrote in
alt.comp.freeware
<news:49d92f7a$0$31427$c5fe31e7@read01.usenet4all.se>:

> On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:17:39 +1000, Me.Here wrote:
>
>> On 5/04/2009 4:01 AM, Roger Sandling wrote:
>>> Franklin J. Camper (alias "Ari") wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well stated, ladies of the lezbo. Methinks BD needs to access
>>>> his groins not his securities. He would be in Good Hands then.
>>>
>>> Everybody can see that "Nicole" and "Amanda Lynn" are your two
>>> newest sockpuppets, and that you are carrying on a
>>> "conversation" with yourself.
>>>
>>> How pathetic.
>>>
>>>
>> They aren't new - they are a couple of old ones Ari's dusts off
>> every now and again. I filter them (along with all his others)
>> so I never have a problem :-)
>
> Good job, Eeyore., er Me.Here would you kindly teach hummingBank
> how to filter Ari...using "Ari"?


Dear ARACari Ph.D.,

Me.Here and Hummingbird have written their world famous filters
incorrectly because they don't have a clue what matching on a special
case means.

Our two technical pygmies are like goofballs who think Einstein's
special theory of relativity is more all-embracing than the general
theory.

So our pgymies don't filter on "Franklin" or "Ari". Oh no, that's just
not fancy enough. They have to go and use some unnecessarily
complicated junk which they think is supposedly better.

Then they complain loudly when one of their unnecessary conditions
fail.


PS: Perhaps the esteemed Professer Bottoms could explain it to them in
his Pygmy 101 lecture.

[BoaterDave]

On Apr 5, 5:59*am, comph...@toddh.net (Todd H.) wrote:
> "~BD~" <BoaterD...@hotmail.co.uk> writes:
>
> > Many thanks for taking the time and trouble to respond in a sensible manner,
> > Todd H - it's much appreciated! :)
>
> > Scissors won't do the job nowadays though - I'm connected wirelessly tomy
> > router (but I get your drift!)
>
> Hee hee. * Would a scissors between the router and the wall at least
> do it? *:-)


Most certainly! ;)



> > I've played around with Virtual Machine 'stuff' but decided to go the Apple
> > Mac route for now. It 'feels' safer, even if it isn't!
>
> It's a less popular target for now at least, and your typical user
> doesn't run as an administrator, so ... it is safer in a number of
> ways. * *But it's far from impervious.


I do understand.



> You can still play with virtualization on the mac too. *Give a look at
> VMWare Fusion if you want a throwback.


I may experiment later - for now I have enough new things to learn!



> You may want to look with suspicion on Safari as much as one does with
> Internet Explorer. *It's proven itself pretty darned pourous over the
> years. *


OK - thanks for the warning! :)


> Enjoy!
>
> Best Regards,
> --
> Todd H.http://www.toddh.net/

Did you note that the links on your web site to your bunnie video
clips no longer 'work' - not here on my computer, anyway?

Cheers
--
Dave

[Sam Jones]

ARACari, Ph.D. explained :
> On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:37:10 +0100, Franklin wrote:
>
>> On 05 Apr 2009 22:23:53 GMT, ARACari, Ph.D. wrote in
>> alt.comp.freeware
>> <news:49d92f7a$0$31427$c5fe31e7@read01.usenet4all.se>:
>>
>>> On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:17:39 +1000, Me.Here wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/04/2009 4:01 AM, Roger Sandling wrote:
>>>>> Franklin J. Camper (alias "Ari") wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Everybody can see that "Nicole" and "Amanda Lynn" are your two
>>>>> newest sockpuppets, and that you are carrying on a
>>>>> "conversation" with yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> How pathetic.
>>>>>
>>>> They aren't new - they are a couple of old ones Ari's dusts off
>>>> every now and again. I filter them (along with all his others)
>>>> so I never have a problem :-)
>>>
>>> Good job, Eeyore., er Me.Here would you kindly teach hummingBank
>>> how to filter Ari...using "Ari"?
>>
>> Dear ARACari Ph.D.,
>>
>> Me.Here and Hummingbird have written their world famous filters
>> incorrectly because they don't have a clue what matching on a special
>> case means.
>>
>> Our two technical pygmies are like goofballs who think Einstein's
>> special theory of relativity is more all-embracing than the general
>> theory.
>>
>> So our pgymies don't filter on "Franklin" or "Ari". Oh no, that's just
>> not fancy enough. They have to go and use some unnecessarily
>> complicated junk which they think is supposedly better.
>>
>> Then they complain loudly when one of their unnecessary conditions
>> fail.
>>
>> PS: Perhaps the esteemed Professer Bottoms could explain it to them in
>> his Pygmy 101 lecture.
>
> Sorry Franklin Joseph Camper of ****ville Alabama, only registered
> freeware researchers are allowed to hear the Great William Billy Bear
> Bottoms formerly of Mena AK, Cajun, living in Baton Rouge, who has a
> Cray in his carport and a dead BIL Adler Berry Seal who was
> assassinated by Medellin cartellians who were taking money from the
> SeeEyeAye what are you gonna do? Nice college boy, didn't want to get
> mixed up in the family business. Now you want to gun down Bear
> Botttoms. Why? Because he slapped you in the face a little? What do you
> think this like the Army Franklin Joseph Camper of ****ville Alabama
> where you can shoot 'em from a mile away? No you gotta get up like this
> and, badda-bing, you blow his brains all over your nice Ivy League suit
> just like they did Barry Seal. C'mere. [Kisses Camper on the head]


I've been staying quiet watching you pair of homos for a long time in
your lovey-dovey relationship. You beat me to outing you ****ing
queers.

FFS. ****** AriAracari kisses poofter FranklinFrank Camper in public.
Worse than dogs. Go and have a threesome with gay HummingHomobird

[Sam Jones]

hummingbird brought next idea :
> 'Sam Jones' wrote this:
>
>> ARACari, Ph.D. explained :
>>> On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:37:10 +0100, Franklin wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 05 Apr 2009 22:23:53 GMT, ARACari, Ph.D. wrote in
>>>> alt.comp.freeware
>>>> <news:49d92f7a$0$31427$c5fe31e7@read01.usenet4all.se>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:17:39 +1000, Me.Here wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Good job, Eeyore., er Me.Here would you kindly teach hummingBank
>>>>> how to filter Ari...using "Ari"?
>>>>
>>>> Dear ARACari Ph.D.,
>>>>
>>>> Me.Here and Hummingbird have written their world famous filters
>>>> incorrectly because they don't have a clue what matching on a special
>>>> case means.
>>>>
>>>> Our two technical pygmies are like goofballs who think Einstein's
>>>> special theory of relativity is more all-embracing than the general
>>>> theory.
>>>>
>>>> So our pgymies don't filter on "Franklin" or "Ari". Oh no, that's just
>>>> not fancy enough. They have to go and use some unnecessarily
>>>> complicated junk which they think is supposedly better.
>>>>
>>>> Then they complain loudly when one of their unnecessary conditions
>>>> fail.
>>>>
>>>> PS: Perhaps the esteemed Professer Bottoms could explain it to them in
>>>> his Pygmy 101 lecture.
>>>
>>> Sorry Franklin Joseph Camper of ****ville Alabama, only registered
>>> freeware researchers are allowed to hear the Great William Billy Bear
>>> Bottoms formerly of Mena AK, Cajun, living in Baton Rouge, who has a
>>> Cray in his carport and a dead BIL Adler Berry Seal who was
>>> assassinated by Medellin cartellians who were taking money from the
>>> SeeEyeAye what are you gonna do? Nice college boy, didn't want to get
>>> mixed up in the family business. Now you want to gun down Bear
>>> Botttoms. Why? Because he slapped you in the face a little? What do you
>>> think this like the Army Franklin Joseph Camper of ****ville Alabama
>>> where you can shoot 'em from a mile away? No you gotta get up like this
>>> and, badda-bing, you blow his brains all over your nice Ivy League suit
>>> just like they did Barry Seal. C'mere. [Kisses Camper on the head]
>>
>> I've been staying quiet watching you pair of homos for a long time in
>> your lovey-dovey relationship. You beat me to outing you ****ing
>> queers.
>>
>> FFS. ****** AriAracari kisses poofter FranklinFrank Camper in public.
>> Worse than dogs. Go and have a threesome with gay HummingHomobird
>
> Nah, I'll let you take my place Sam, you obviously can't wait to
> get in there with The Franklins.

Gay poofter.

[ARACari, Ph.D.]

On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:37:10 +0100, Franklin wrote:

> On 05 Apr 2009 22:23:53 GMT, ARACari, Ph.D. wrote in
> alt.comp.freeware
> <news:49d92f7a$0$31427$c5fe31e7@read01.usenet4all.se>:
>
>> On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:17:39 +1000, Me.Here wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/04/2009 4:01 AM, Roger Sandling wrote:
>>>> Franklin J. Camper (alias "Ari") wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well stated, ladies of the lezbo. Methinks BD needs to access
>>>>> his groins not his securities. He would be in Good Hands then.
>>>>
>>>> Everybody can see that "Nicole" and "Amanda Lynn" are your two
>>>> newest sockpuppets, and that you are carrying on a
>>>> "conversation" with yourself.
>>>>
>>>> How pathetic.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> They aren't new - they are a couple of old ones Ari's dusts off
>>> every now and again. I filter them (along with all his others)
>>> so I never have a problem :-)
>>
>> Good job, Eeyore., er Me.Here would you kindly teach hummingBank
>> how to filter Ari...using "Ari"?
>
> Dear ARACari Ph.D.,
>
> Me.Here and Hummingbird have written their world famous filters
> incorrectly because they don't have a clue what matching on a special
> case means.
>
> Our two technical pygmies are like goofballs who think Einstein's
> special theory of relativity is more all-embracing than the general
> theory.
>
> So our pgymies don't filter on "Franklin" or "Ari". Oh no, that's just
> not fancy enough. They have to go and use some unnecessarily
> complicated junk which they think is supposedly better.
>
> Then they complain loudly when one of their unnecessary conditions
> fail.
>
> PS: Perhaps the esteemed Professer Bottoms could explain it to them in
> his Pygmy 101 lecture.

Sorry Franklin Joseph Camper of ****ville Alabama, only registered
freeware researchers are allowed to hear the Great William Billy Bear
Bottoms formerly of Mena AK, Cajun, living in Baton Rouge, who has a
Cray in his carport and a dead BIL Adler Berry Seal who was
assassinated by Medellin cartellians who were taking money from the
SeeEyeAye what are you gonna do? Nice college boy, didn't want to get
mixed up in the family business. Now you want to gun down Bear
Botttoms. Why? Because he slapped you in the face a little? What do you
think this like the Army Franklin Joseph Camper of ****ville Alabama
where you can shoot 'em from a mile away? No you gotta get up like this
and, badda-bing, you blow his brains all over your nice Ivy League suit
just like they did Barry Seal. C'mere. [Kisses Camper on the head]
--
Doctorate from FreeBeArSciEnce University (FreeBASE U) aka FU
Motto: "Rangifer tarandus cum tenacles"
Mascot: Raindeer with tenacles..and such
Perfesser Embearclitus: William "Billy" "Bear" Bottoms