View Full Version : Balun for Sector
Hey guys,
Was wondering what is the smallest coax someone can use to make a
Balun for this Sector antenna.
http://pe2er.nl/wifisector/
Reason is the RG-58 is so short and hard to bend'
Can you use a smaller diameter coax and still have this antena work?
Thanks guys
Pete
Jeff Liebermann
09-21-08, 09:20 AM
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 05:43:31 -0700 (PDT), Knight
<petelarosa@comcast.net> wrote:
>Was wondering what is the smallest coax someone can use to make a
>Balun for this Sector antenna.
>http://pe2er.nl/wifisector/
>Reason is the RG-58 is so short and hard to bend'
>Can you use a smaller diameter coax and still have this antena work?
Read the article again. The author uses RG-316/u teflon dielectric
cable for the balun. Outside diameter = 0.100". The RG-58a/u is used
for the feed line (which is pushed through a brass tube and soldered
to the PCB reflector). For such short runs, the coax cable losses are
not important.
I use semi-rigid 0.087" diameter coax because it's easy to handle,
easy to solder, no messy braid, and I happen to have some. There are
smaller sizes, but those are far more difficult to handle:
<http://www.micro-coax.com/pages/products/ProductTypes/CableTypes/Semi-RigidCoaxial/EqualTo50ohms/Size.asp>
If you can find one, get a thermal wire stripper for teflon. If not,
use a sharp Exacto knife, or make your own hot wire thermal stripper.
There may be some differences in the strip length of the balun coax.
Length = 0.5 wavelength * velocity_factor
Most of the stuff I use has a measured Vf of 0.70, but there are some
oddities floating around, especially if you buy surplus. Measuring
the Vf might also be helpful if you can't identify the cable.
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Knight wrote:
> Reason is the RG-58 is so short and hard to bend'
Time Microwave LMR-100
On Sep 21, 10:20*am, DTC <DTC_no_s...@example.com> wrote:
> Knight wrote:
> > Reason is the RG-58 is so short and hard to bend'
>
> Time Microwave LMR-100
Jeff not sure what RG-316 is, but is it small like LMR-100 like DTC
says?
Now that would be nice if I can that!
What would be the length to use if in fact I can use LMR-100?
Thanks guys
Pete
Jeff Liebermann
09-21-08, 02:37 PM
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:30:58 -0700 (PDT), Knight
<petelarosa@comcast.net> wrote:
>On Sep 21, 10:20*am, DTC <DTC_no_s...@example.com> wrote:
>> Knight wrote:
>> > Reason is the RG-58 is so short and hard to bend'
>>
>> Time Microwave LMR-100
>
>Jeff not sure what RG-316 is, but is it small like LMR-100 like DTC
>says?
Both LMR-100 and RG-316/u are about 0.100" in diameter.
LMR-100 is stiffer and does not bend easily. RG-316/u does not have a
foil shield, and therefore bends much easier. Either will suffice.
<http://parts.digikey.com/1/parts/34986-coax-cable-rg316-u-50-ohm-9316-br001.html>
See photo of RG-316/u on bottom of page.
A suitable alternative would be RG-188/u which is 0.110" diameter but
has a tape wound PTFE outer jacked instead of FEP.
> Now that would be nice if I can that!
> What would be the length to use if in fact I can use LMR-100?
The velocity factor of LMR-100 is 0.67.
One wavelength at 2.44 GHz (mid band) is 12.3 cm in free space.
The shield strip length (not the cut length) is:
length = 0.67 * 12.3cm / 2 = 4.12cm
See the diagram for how the balun is built.
Incidentally, I've now built about 6 assorted AMOS/Franklin antennas
including some really weird constructs. They all work just fine,
although the higher gain versions required using a sweep generator to
accurately adjust the center frequency.
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
On Sep 21, 3:37*pm, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:30:58 -0700 (PDT), Knight
>
> <petelar...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >On Sep 21, 10:20*am, DTC <DTC_no_s...@example.com> wrote:
> >> Knight wrote:
> >> > Reason is the RG-58 is so short and hard to bend'
>
> >> Time Microwave LMR-100
>
> >Jeff not sure what RG-316 is, * but is it small like LMR-100 like DTC
> >says?
>
> Both LMR-100 and RG-316/u are about 0.100" in diameter.
> LMR-100 is stiffer and does not bend easily. *RG-316/u does not have a
> foil shield, and therefore bends much easier. *Either will suffice.
>
> <http://parts.digikey.com/1/parts/34986-coax-cable-rg316-u-50-ohm-9316...>
> See photo of RG-316/u on bottom of page.
>
> A suitable alternative would be RG-188/u which is 0.110" diameter but
> has a tape wound PTFE outer jacked instead of FEP. *
>
> > Now that would be nice if I can that!
> > What would be the length to use if in fact I can use LMR-100?
>
> The velocity factor of LMR-100 is 0.67.
> One wavelength at 2.44 GHz (mid band) is 12.3 cm in free space.
> The shield strip length (not the cut length) is:
> * *length = 0.67 * 12.3cm / 2 = 4.12cm
> See the diagram for how the balun is built.
>
> Incidentally, I've now built about 6 assorted AMOS/Franklin antennas
> including some really weird constructs. *They all work just fine,
> although the higher gain versions required using a sweep generator to
> accurately adjust the center frequency.
>
> --
> Jeff Liebermann * * je...@cruzio.com
> 150 Felker St #D * *http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
> Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com
> Skype: JeffLiebermann * * AE6KS * *831-336-2558
Excellent news Jeff!
Thank you.
If you look at my sector here http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-8/361947/IMG_7445(Medium).JPG
You'll notice that the copper tubing is soldered to the "N" female
connector underneith and also to the main board.
I saw diagrams how to solder the shielding together at the Balun but
since I'm soldered to the connector AND
the backplane then would it be safe to say that I can then solder the
Balun shielding straight
to the copper tubing?
I also changed the design of the biquad. What do you think now?
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-8/361947/DXNHA-IMG_7461(Medium).JPG
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-8/361947/FTWLS-IMG_7459cropped.jpg
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-8/361947/JYXIY-IMG_7459(Medium).JPG
I really appreciate and respect your input sir'
Thank You
Pete
Jeff Liebermann
09-21-08, 11:04 PM
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:47:13 -0700 (PDT), Knight
<petelarosa@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Incidentally, I've now built about 6 assorted AMOS/Franklin antennas
>> including some really weird constructs. *They all work just fine,
>> although the higher gain versions required using a sweep generator to
>> accurately adjust the center frequency.
More links on AMOS and Franklin antennas from my messy bookmark
collection:
http://yu1aw.ba-karlsruhe.de/ANT.htm
http://yu1aw.ba-karlsruhe.de/vhf_ant.htm
http://www.qsl.net/yu1aw/vhf_ant.htm
http://www.brest-wireless.net/gallery/AntenneAmos
http://www.brest-wireless.net/wiki/materiel:amos
http://pe2er.nl/wifisector/
>If you look at my sector here http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-8/361947/IMG_7445(Medium).JPG
>You'll notice that the copper tubing is soldered to the "N" female
>connector underneith and also to the main board.
Looks about right. What type of coax is that shoved into the copper
tube? It kinda looks like aluminum foil outer shield, which won't
work because it can't be soldered. You don't really need the shield
on the coax as the copper tube provides that function.
Also, that's a Radio Shock soldering iron which is grossly
underpowered for soldering large "heat sink" type PCB's, connectors,
and coax cables. My guess(tm) it's 35w at best. You need something
like a 60watt or higher iron, with thermostat control at 850F, and a
wide chisel tip. The soldering looks like the results of trying to
solder the new and disgusting lead-free solder at too low a
temperature. Use a hot iron, flux if necessary, and work fast.
>I saw diagrams how to solder the shielding together at the Balun but
>since I'm soldered to the connector AND
>the backplane then would it be safe to say that I can then solder the
>Balun shielding straight
>to the copper tubing?
Yep. It's all one big solid ground (shield) around the center coax.
The trick is to keep the shield end points of the balun fairly close
together. Everything else can be somewhat creative. Use the photo
at:
<http://pe2er.nl/wifisector/>
for a guide. Note that the center coax cable has no shield or shield
braid inside the copper tube.
>I also changed the design of the biquad. What do you think now?
>http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-8/361947/DXNHA-IMG_7461(Medium).JPG
Check the dimensions of the PCB reflector. It doesn't look quite
right. Hard to tell from this small a photo.
>http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-8/361947/FTWLS-IMG_7459cropped.jpg
Clever idea, but un-necessary. The only thing that's really critical
on the biquad is the *LENGTH* of the loop on each side. You can be
very creative with the shape, but not the length. The length is
measured from where the two loops hit each other plus any length added
from exposed center conductor and shield conductors. The center pin
connection is correct, but you've effectively added a tiny amount of
length to the ground side. It's probably not critical as the antenna
is fairly broadband, but it will tend to lower the optimum center
frequency slightly. You can shorten both loops to compensate, but I
would just shorten the ground extension and solder the two loops to
ground slightly lower on the copper tube. Yeah, I know it doesn't
look as aesthetically perfect that way, but it should work slightly
better.
Note that it's not super critical and will probably work as you built
it. There were a bunch of construction articles on biquads that
totally dispensed with the copper tube coax cable extension and
replaced them with a thin wire. I originally declared this to be
technically disgusting and suggested that it be done correctly. I
then modeled the antenna and found that it still had all of the usual
+8dBi gain, but that the VSWR was considerably higher. That will
create some losses, but is not totally fatal. So, even built wrong,
it will still work.
The right way:
<http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/Biquad/>
The wrong way:
<http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/biquad-junk/>
Also, the soldering in the closeup is atrocious but not unexpected
considering the new lead-free solder and the cold soldering iron.
Wiggle the wires and the solder connection will probably break. Try
to make it look smooth and shiny. Note that mixing solder types will
result in a guaranteed dull and brittle connection. Don't do it.
>http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-8/361947/JYXIY-IMG_7459(Medium).JPG
What are you using for insulators at the ends? It kinda looks like a
dark color, which might be carbon filled nylon (anti-static). Those
will work, but you really want something that is a good RF insulator,
such as PTFE or coax dielectric. Nylon is hygroscopic (absorbs
moisture) and will cause problems if used outdoors.
>I really appreciate and respect your input sir'
Easy on the "sir" thing. It might make me more arrogant, if that's
possible.
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
On Sep 22, 12:04*am, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:47:13 -0700 (PDT), Knight
>
> <petelar...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> Incidentally, I've now built about 6 assorted AMOS/Franklin antennas
> >> including some really weird constructs. *They all work just fine,
> >> although the higher gain versions required using a sweep generator to
> >> accurately adjust the center frequency.
>
> More links on AMOS and Franklin antennas from my messy bookmark
> collection:http://yu1aw.ba-karlsruhe.de/ANT.htmhttp://yu1aw.ba-karlsruhe.de/vhf_ant.htmhttp://www.qsl.net/yu1aw/vhf_ant.htmhttp://www.brest-wireless..net/gallery/AntenneAmoshttp://www.brest-wireless.net/wiki/materiel:amoshttp://pe2er.nl/wifisector/
>
> >If you look at my sector here *http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-8/361947/IMG_7445(Medium).JPG
> >You'll notice that the copper tubing is soldered to the "N" female
> >connector underneith and also to the main board.
>
> Looks about right. *What type of coax is that shoved into the copper
> tube? *It kinda looks like aluminum foil outer shield, which won't
> work because it can't be soldered. *You don't really need the shield
> on the coax as the copper tube provides that function.
The coax is LMR-400 with outer coating and braid removed. To much
hassle to remove the foil
so I left it on, makes a tighter fit anyway. But since the tubing is
soldered to the connector
AND the reflector then can I just solder the Balun shield/braid to the
copper tubing?
>
> Also, that's a Radio Shock soldering iron which is grossly
> underpowered for soldering large "heat sink" type PCB's, connectors,
> and coax cables. *My guess(tm) it's 35w at best. *You need something
> like a 60watt or higher iron, with thermostat control at 850F, and a
> wide chisel tip. *The soldering looks like the results of trying to
> solder the new and disgusting lead-free solder at too low a
> temperature. *Use a hot iron, flux if necessary, and work fast.
Have you been reading my mind? I've been pondering for days now which
iron to get from this site here...
http://www.action-electronics.com/solderingirons.htm
My God there are so many to choose from though!
What do you like for this kind of work?
The iron in the photo is a Sears 45 W. It just about almost does it
so I
was thinking a nice 60 Watt should be fine, do you?
>
> >I saw diagrams how to solder the shielding together at the Balun but
> >since I'm soldered to the connector AND
> >the backplane then would it be safe to say that I can then solder the
> >Balun shielding straight
> >to the copper tubing?
>
> Yep. *It's all one big solid ground (shield) around the center coax.
> The trick is to keep the shield end points of the balun fairly close
> together. *Everything else can be somewhat creative. *Use the photo
> at:
> <http://pe2er.nl/wifisector/>
> for a guide. *Note that the center coax cable has no shield or shield
> braid inside the copper tube.
>
> >I also changed the design of the biquad. What do you think now?
> >http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-8/361947/DXNHA-IMG_7461(Medium).JPG
>
> Check the dimensions of the PCB reflector. *It doesn't look quite
> right. * Hard to tell from this small a photo.
Yeh the reflector is ok. It's 123mm X 123mm
>
> >http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-8/361947/FTWLS-IMG_7459cropped.jpg
>
> Clever idea, but un-necessary. *The only thing that's really critical
> on the biquad is the *LENGTH* of the loop on each side. *You can be
> very creative with the shape, but not the length. *The length is
> measured from where the two loops hit each other plus any length added
> from exposed center conductor and shield conductors. *The center pin
> connection is correct, but you've effectively added a tiny amount of
> length to the ground side. *It's probably not critical as the antenna
> is fairly broadband, but it will tend to lower the optimum center
> frequency slightly. *You can shorten both loops to compensate, but I
> would just shorten the ground extension and solder the two loops to
> ground slightly lower on the copper tube. *Yeah, I know it doesn't
> look as aesthetically perfect that way, but it should work slightly
> better.
>
> Note that it's not super critical and will probably work as you built
> it. *There were a bunch of construction articles on biquads that
> totally dispensed with the copper tube coax cable extension and
> replaced them with a thin wire. *I originally declared this to be
> technically disgusting and suggested that it be done correctly. *I
> then modeled the antenna and found that it still had all of the usual
> +8dBi gain, but that the VSWR was considerably higher. *That will
> create some losses, but is not totally fatal. *So, even built wrong,
> it will still work.
>
> The right way:
> <http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/Biquad/>
>
> The wrong way:
> <http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/biquad-junk/>
>
> Also, the soldering in the closeup is atrocious but not unexpected
> considering the new lead-free solder and the cold soldering iron.
> Wiggle the wires and the solder connection will probably break. *Try
> to make it look smooth and shiny. *Note that mixing solder types will
> result in a guaranteed dull and brittle connection. *Don't do it.
I pull real good on the connections before I sell! They're on there
good
but I know what you mean about being nice and shiny. Better iron
will that for sure. Help me out with a good selection on a decent
iron
if you have a minute.
And what about solder? Any recomendations?
>
> >http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-8/361947/JYXIY-IMG_7459(Medium).JPG
>
> What are you using for insulators at the ends? *It kinda looks like a
> dark color, which might be carbon filled nylon (anti-static). *Those
> will work, but you really want something that is a good RF insulator,
> such as PTFE or coax dielectric. *Nylon is hygroscopic (absorbs
> moisture) and will cause problems if used outdoors.
The insulators are plastic tubing. Not sure what kind but feels like
tubing
you would use for your ice maker in your freezer.
Twist ties coming up from bottom.
>
> >I really appreciate and respect your input sir'
>
> Easy on the "sir" thing. *It might make me more arrogant, if that's
> possible.
Ha Ha ok Dude! LOL
Pete
>
> --
> Jeff Liebermann * * je...@cruzio.com
> 150 Felker St #D * *http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
> Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com
> Skype: JeffLiebermann * * AE6KS * *831-336-2558
Jeff Liebermann
09-22-08, 06:21 PM
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:50:56 -0700 (PDT), Knight
<petelarosa@comcast.net> wrote:
>The coax is LMR-400 with outer coating and braid removed. To much
>hassle to remove the foil
>so I left it on, makes a tighter fit anyway. But since the tubing is
>soldered to the connector
>AND the reflector then can I just solder the Balun shield/braid to the
>copper tubing?
Yep. If the foil is a tight fit, it's good enough. Soldering the
balun to the copper tube is just fine. I'm a bit worried about tiny
sparks from arcing or electrolysis between the aluminum and copper,
but I don't think it will be a problem.
>Have you been reading my mind?
Yep. My crystal ball shows everything. I can read everything (except
the documentation).
>I've been pondering for days now which
>iron to get from this site here...
>http://www.action-electronics.com/solderingirons.htm
>My God there are so many to choose from though!
>What do you like for this kind of work?
What you really should do is try to find some ecologically disgusting
60/40 or better yet, 63/37 rosin core leaded solder. When I realized
that the supply is going to dry up, I stocked up with about 10 lbs of
the stuff. Where it's mandatory is for repairing circuit boards that
have been soldered with leaded solder. Using lead-free on that just
makes a big mess.
I'm a big fan of Weller soldering irons. Unfortunately, they're also
the most expensive. I have a lifetime supply of parts and pieces
thanks to a failed dot.com so I don't plan to do any shopping. That
means I don't have a clue what's available today.
> The iron in the photo is a Sears 45 W. It just about almost does it
>so I
>was thinking a nice 60 Watt should be fine, do you?
Don't look at the power dissipation. If you must, my guess is you'll
need at least 70 watts to get up to 850F. That's only for irons that
don't have a thermostatically controlled tip. What you want is 750F
for leaded, and 850F for lead free, preferably adjustable. Plan on
buying an assortment of Weller tips at about $6/ea.
This is what I have a few of:
<http://www.action-electronics.com/wewtcpt.htm>
Way too expensive. Works fine, but uses a mechanical thermostat that
requires chronic rebuilding. Not recommended unless you have lots of
spare parts.
I was thinking something more like this cheapo:
<http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=310084368976>
<http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=300259180266>
I've seen these as low as $15 at ham radio swap meets. One of my
friends bought a pile and hasn't complained (much) about them. It
doesn't get quite hot enough, but I think it will work for everything
except what you're now doing (large copper heat sinks). For the big
copper stuff, get a propane torch with a big fat copper soldering tip
attachment. That's what I use for the big stuff.
>Yeh the reflector is ok. It's 123mm X 123mm
I do mine this way:
<http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/Biquad/slides/biqad-geom.html>
>And what about solder? Any recomendations?
Yeah. Get some leaded 63/37 or 60/40 solder. If you can't get rosin
core, get solid core and use some liquid rosin flux. Wash with your
favorite toxic chlorinated hydrocarbon solvent and cleaner. (paint
thinner works well).
>The insulators are plastic tubing. Not sure what kind but feels like
>tubing
>you would use for your ice maker in your freezer.
>Twist ties coming up from bottom.
It's probably ok but I can't tell for sure. Put a few in the
microwave oven. If they melt, they're no good. If they just sit
there, don't worry about it. Oh yeah, put a glass of water in the
microwave oven when you do this to give the magnetron a load.
--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558 jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
# http://802.11junk.com jeffl@cruzio.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
On Sep 22, 7:21*pm, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:50:56 -0700 (PDT), Knight
>
> <petelar...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >The coax is LMR-400 with outer coating and braid removed. *To much
> >hassle to remove the foil
> >so I left it on, makes a tighter fit anyway. *But since the tubing is
> >soldered to the connector
> >AND the reflector then can I just solder the Balun shield/braid to the
> >copper tubing?
>
> Yep. *If the foil is a tight fit, it's good enough. *Soldering the
> balun to the copper tube is just fine. *I'm a bit worried about tiny
> sparks from arcing or electrolysis between the aluminum and copper,
> but I don't think it will be a problem.
I'll have to see how it goes but like you say I think it will be all
right too'
>
> >Have you been reading my mind?
>
> Yep. *My crystal ball shows everything. *I can read everything (except
> the documentation).
>
> >I've been pondering for days now which
> >iron to get from this site here...
> >http://www.action-electronics.com/solderingirons.htm
> >My God there are so many to choose from though!
> >What do you like for this kind of work?
>
> What you really should do is try to find some ecologically disgusting
> 60/40 or better yet, 63/37 rosin core leaded solder. *When I realized
> that the supply is going to dry up, I stocked up with about 10 lbs of
> the stuff. *Where it's mandatory is for repairing circuit boards that
> have been soldered with leaded solder. *Using lead-free on that just
> makes a big mess.
How can you tell if the board was soldered with leaded or unleaded?
My kids are always asking me to mod their game controllers and things
but I never know what kind of solder to use!
I'm also going to get that real skinny 12W iron just for these type of
things too!
What's the skinniest diameter solder I should get for this type of
work?
Soldering USB adapters also'
>
> I'm a big fan of Weller soldering irons. *Unfortunately, they're also
> the most expensive. *I have a lifetime supply of parts and pieces
> thanks to a failed dot.com so I don't plan to do any shopping. *That
> means I don't have a clue what's available today.
>
> > The iron in the photo is a Sears 45 W. *It just about almost does it
> >so I
> >was thinking a nice 60 Watt should be fine, do you?
>
> Don't look at the power dissipation. *If you must, my guess is you'll
> need at least 70 watts to get up to 850F. *That's only for irons that
> don't have a thermostatically controlled tip. *What you want is 750F
> for leaded, and 850F for lead free, preferably adjustable. *Plan on
> buying an assortment of Weller tips at about $6/ea.
Well that page that had all the Weller irons on it has a 60W and then
an 80W.
Would you say try the 80 instead of the 60W?
*
>
> This is what I have a few of:
> <http://www.action-electronics.com/wewtcpt.htm>
> Way too expensive. *Works fine, but uses a mechanical thermostat that
> requires chronic rebuilding. *Not recommended unless you have lots of
> spare parts.
WOW now they are sweet! I wouldn't know how to work on the
thermostat! LOL
>
> I was thinking something more like this cheapo:
> <http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=310084368976>
> <http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=300259180266>
> I've seen these as low as $15 at ham radio swap meets. *One of my
> friends bought a pile and hasn't complained (much) about them. *It
> doesn't get quite hot enough, but I think it will work for everything
> except what you're now doing (large copper heat sinks). *For the big
> copper stuff, get a propane torch with a big fat copper soldering tip
> attachment. *That's what I use for the big stuff.
They look ok but are they toys do you think? I wonder how long they
will last!
>
> >Yeh the reflector is ok. It's 123mm X 123mm
>
> I do mine this way:
> <http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/Biquad/slides/biqad-geom.html>
I saw that way also! I may try one of them too.
>
> >And what about solder? *Any recomendations?
>
> Yeah. *Get some leaded 63/37 or 60/40 solder. *If you can't get rosin
> core, get solid core and use some liquid rosin flux. *Wash with your
> favorite toxic chlorinated hydrocarbon solvent and cleaner. *(paint
> thinner works well).
>
> >The insulators are plastic tubing. *Not sure what kind but feels like
> >tubing
> >you would use for your ice maker in your freezer.
> >Twist ties coming up from bottom.
>
> It's probably ok but I can't tell for sure. *Put a few in the
> microwave oven. *If they melt, they're no good. *If they just sit
> there, don't worry about it. *Oh yeah, put a glass of water in the
> microwave oven when you do this to give the magnetron a load.
Yeh I was thinking that today about the microwave. I'll let ya know
how that comes out but
I think they will be ok, we'll see'
Thanks again Jeff! Talk at ya tomorrow after work.
Pete
>
> --
> # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
> # 831-336-2558 * * * * * *je...@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
> #http://802.11junk.com* * * * * * * je...@cruzio.com
> #http://www.LearnByDestroying.com* * * * * * * AE6KS
Jeff Liebermann
09-23-08, 12:16 AM
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:34:28 -0700 (PDT), Knight
<petelarosa@comcast.net> wrote:
>How can you tell if the board was soldered with leaded or unleaded?
Two ways. One is to look for the RoHS label on the board, which
always indicates lead-free. The other is to do a test soldering on a
small area of the board using lead-free solder. If it looks dull gray
and not shiney, the board uses lead/tin solder.
>I'm also going to get that real skinny 12W iron just for these type of
>things too!
Too low wattage. You want it hot at 850F for lead-free. Lots of heat
and work fast. That way you get good reflow, and a small heat
affected zone.
>What's the skinniest diameter solder I should get for this type of
>work?
I dunno. I have all kinds of different diameters laying around. I
use them all randomly.
>Well that page that had all the Weller irons on it has a 60W and then
>an 80W.
>Would you say try the 80 instead of the 60W?
60 watt is about right for lead-tin. It will also work with lead-free
but you'll need to take more time heating the joint. 80 watts is what
methinks is right for both.
>WOW now they are sweet! I wouldn't know how to work on the
>thermostat! LOL
Fixing the thermostat isn't the problem. Cramming the mess back into
the soldering iron handles is what generates the profanity.
>They look ok but are they toys do you think? I wonder how long they
>will last!
Oh swell....now you're expecting reliability? At about $35, you're
not going to get much of a quality product. It's adequate, I've used
them, and they work. They're not the best, they don't have a LED
display with the temperature, there's no desoldering attachment, and
you can't install a wide range of SMT soldering/desoldering tips. In
other words, it's a basic soldering iron suitable for being used and
abused. If you want quality, be prepared to spend some real money.
Look at Pace, Hakko, or other vendors of "soldering stations".
<http://www.hakkousa.com/products.asp>
<http://www.paceworldwide.com>
Incidentally, I check the power of the typical soldering pencils from
these vendors. 75 or 80 watts.
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>
> I'm a big fan of Weller soldering irons. Unfortunately, they're also
> the most expensive.
I also am a fan of Weller irons, I have an old EC2002 series iron which
I bought at a car boot sale extremely cheaply as it required repairing.
Since repair it has run for several years without problem.
The manuals seem to be readily available:-
<http://bama.edebris.com/download/weller/ec2002/Service%20Info%20Weller-EC-2002.pdf>
<http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/weller/>
My only problem now that I have retired is that I no longer have a
calibrated thermistor probe/unit to setup/calibrate the station.
Jeff Liebermann
09-23-08, 10:56 AM
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:23:09 +0100, LR <lrme@privacy.net> wrote:
>Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>> I'm a big fan of Weller soldering irons. Unfortunately, they're also
>> the most expensive.
>I also am a fan of Weller irons, I have an old EC2002 series iron which
>I bought at a car boot sale extremely cheaply as it required repairing.
>Since repair it has run for several years without problem.
>The manuals seem to be readily available:-
><http://bama.edebris.com/download/weller/ec2002/Service%20Info%20Weller-EC-2002.pdf>
><http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/weller/>
>My only problem now that I have retired is that I no longer have a
>calibrated thermistor probe/unit to setup/calibrate the station.
I have two EC2002 irons. One works, the other has a fried control
board. A friend also has two, both with fried control boards. One of
these daze, I'll reverse engineer the schematic and fix them.
Are you sure you don't mean thermocouple, not thermistor? Thermistors
usually don't work above about 400F.
I use an InfraRed optical thermometer for setting up my soldering
irons. I've compared it with a thermocouple plugged into my DVM and
found it to be "close enough".
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:23:09 +0100, LR <lrme@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>>> I'm a big fan of Weller soldering irons. Unfortunately, they're also
>>> the most expensive.
>
>> I also am a fan of Weller irons, I have an old EC2002 series iron which
>> I bought at a car boot sale extremely cheaply as it required repairing.
>> Since repair it has run for several years without problem.
>> The manuals seem to be readily available:-
>> <http://bama.edebris.com/download/weller/ec2002/Service%20Info%20Weller-EC-2002.pdf>
>> <http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/weller/>
>> My only problem now that I have retired is that I no longer have a
>> calibrated thermistor probe/unit to setup/calibrate the station.
>
> I have two EC2002 irons. One works, the other has a fried control
> board. A friend also has two, both with fried control boards. One of
> these daze, I'll reverse engineer the schematic and fix them.
>
> Are you sure you don't mean thermocouple, not thermistor? Thermistors
> usually don't work above about 400F.
Some of the NTC Thermistors will do upto 250C and some NTC Si
Thermistors will go upto 500C.
The unit that was used for checking was owned by the electrical
section,so I wasn't allowed to take it apart, and was used to check all
solder stations on a yearly basis and I used to get mine done at the
same time .
>
> I use an InfraRed optical thermometer for setting up my soldering
> irons. I've compared it with a thermocouple plugged into my DVM and
> found it to be "close enough".
>
On Sep 23, 1:16*am, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:34:28 -0700 (PDT), Knight
>
> <petelar...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >How can you tell if the board was soldered with leaded or unleaded?
>
> Two ways. *One is to look for the RoHS label on the board, which
> always indicates lead-free. *The other is to do a test soldering on a
> small area of the board using lead-free solder. *If it looks dull gray
> and not shiney, the board uses lead/tin solder.
>
> >I'm also going to get that real skinny 12W iron just for these type of
> >things too!
>
> Too low wattage. *You want it hot at 850F for lead-free. *Lots of heat
> and work fast. *That way you get good reflow, and a small heat
> affected zone.
>
> >What's the skinniest diameter solder I should get for this type of
> >work?
>
> I dunno. *I have all kinds of different diameters laying around. *I
> use them all randomly.
>
> >Well that page that had all the Weller irons on it has a 60W and then
> >an 80W.
> >Would you say try the 80 instead of the 60W?
>
> 60 watt is about right for lead-tin. *It will also work with lead-free
> but you'll need to take more time heating the joint. *80 watts is what
> methinks is right for both.
>
> >WOW now they are sweet! *I wouldn't know how to work on the
> >thermostat! *LOL
>
> Fixing the thermostat isn't the problem. *Cramming the mess back into
> the soldering iron handles is what generates the profanity.
>
> >They look ok but are they toys do you think? *I wonder how long they
> >will last!
>
> Oh swell....now you're expecting reliability? *At about $35, you're
> not going to get much of a quality product. *It's adequate, I've used
> them, and they work. *They're not the best, they don't have a LED
> display with the temperature, there's no desoldering attachment, and
> you can't install a wide range of SMT soldering/desoldering tips. *In
> other words, it's a basic soldering iron suitable for being used and
> abused. *If you want quality, be prepared to spend some real money.
> Look at Pace, Hakko, or other vendors of "soldering stations".
> <http://www.hakkousa.com/products.asp>
> <http://www.paceworldwide.com>
> Incidentally, I check the power of the typical soldering pencils from
> these vendors. *75 or 80 watts.
>
> --
> Jeff Liebermann * * je...@cruzio.com
> 150 Felker St #D * *http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
> Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com
> Skype: JeffLiebermann * * AE6KS * *831-336-2558
Did we start talking about two different applications here because I
got confused.
For the Balun and 1/4' tubing you thinks the 80 W would be better
correct?
Did you also say the 12W isnb't good for the tiny work? USB adapters
and the kids
game controllers?
If I get a bigger iron for the tiny soldering then it's hard to find
tiny tips that fit it, is that correct?
Oh wait, did you then say 80W is right for both!
Both tiny and the copper tubing!?
Sorry buddy, just trying to learn more.
I'm pretty good at general soldering but I didn't realize the
different solders to use now!
Pete
Jeff Liebermann
09-23-08, 07:00 PM
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:50:20 -0700 (PDT), Knight
<petelarosa@comcast.net> wrote:
>Did we start talking about two different applications here because I
>got confused.
I'm good at doing that. I won't appologize because I have no plans to
change my ways.
> For the Balun and 1/4' tubing you thinks the 80 W would be better
>correct?
The balun is a tiny wire. No need for a hotter than hell iron. 750F
will work with either type of solder.
However, the 1/4" copper tube and PCB are great heat sinks. You need
a big tip fat chisle tip, propane torch with soldering tip, or giant
electric soldering iron. It's not about how hot it gets, but about
how much energy you transfer from the iron to the work. Big heat
sinks require much more than small pieces of coax cable. YOu can do
all that with one iron and a selection of tips and temperatures
(possibly adjustable).
>Did you also say the 12W isnb't good for the tiny work?
I have a 12w pencil iron in my truck for emergencies. If I want to
wait all day for it to heat up my work, I can sorta use it. It's a
PITA and nearly useless except for really tiny work.
What you want is an iron that gets really hot. Then you work VERY
fast to minimize the heat affected zone. You can do it the other way
around with a nearly stone cold iron, but it will take nearly forever
to get the solder to melt and flow.
>USB adapters
>and the kids
>game controllers?
60 watt iron. 750F tip for lead-tin. 850F tip for lead-free. 1/16"
chistle tip (or something similar) for working with PCB with
conventional components. Pointed tip or tweezer tips for SMT. Two
soldering irons for playing tweezer if you're lazy (like me).
>If I get a bigger iron for the tiny soldering then it's hard to find
>tiny tips that fit it, is that correct?
Dunno. The really big irons, suitable for stained glass work, and
soldering nickel steel sewing machine attachments, won't work for
small PCB work. However, the common soldering station has a huge
array of tips for every possible purpose.
<http://www.cooperhandtools.com/brands/weller/index.cfm?model_list=1&att_id=WEL007%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20&att1=Tips%20and%20Nozzles%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20&att2=PT%20Series>
>Oh wait, did you then say 80W is right for both!
>Both tiny and the copper tubing!?
Nope. I said that the commercial soldering stations are 75 to 80
watts. However, I again stress that it's not the wattage, but the
temprature that's important. All the wattage buys you is the ability
to run big tips, solder big heat sinks, and get up to temperature
fast.
>Sorry buddy, just trying to learn more.
Argh. Stuff like this is all over the internet.
>I'm pretty good at general soldering but I didn't realize the
>different solders to use now!
The middle photo didn't look all that wonderful.
--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558 jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
# http://802.11junk.com jeffl@cruzio.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.