PDA

View Full Version : Need Help With TCPoptimize


pokemon17007
08-17-08, 09:27 PM
I have done some with the TCPoptimize, and the result is below

« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 08.17.2008 22:12
IP address: 117.4.xxx.xxx

TCP options string: 020405ac01010402
MSS: 1452
MTU: 1492
TCP Window: 63888 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 0
Unscaled RWIN : 63888
Reccomended RWINs: 63888, 127776, 255552, 511104
BDP limit (200ms): 2556kbps (319KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1022kbps (128KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 45
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00001000 (8)
Precedence: 000 (routine)
Delay: 0 (normal delay)
Throughput: 1 (low throughput)
Reliability: 0 (normal reliability)
Cost: 0 (normal cost)
Check bit: 0 (correct)
DiffServ: No valid DiffServ equivalent (000010)


Result for tracerting yahoo.com
Tracing route to yahoo.com [206.190.60.37]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 14 ms 14 ms 9 ms 117.4.192.1
3 14 ms 10 ms 13 ms 203.113.190.13
4 12 ms 13 ms 10 ms 203.113.158.28
5 117 ms 109 ms * pos8-12.br01.hkg04.pccwbtn.net [63.218.115.25]
6 612 ms 597 ms 597 ms yahoo.ge5-2.br02.sjo01.pccwbtn.net [63.218.7.102
]
7 631 ms 651 ms 662 ms as0.pat1.dnx.yahoo.com [216.115.101.148]
8 356 ms 343 ms 348 ms so-1-0-0.pat1.che.yahoo.com [216.115.96.35]
9 675 ms 651 ms 656 ms so-1-0-0.pat1.dcp.yahoo.com [216.115.101.152]
10 704 ms 688 ms 341 ms ae1-p170.msr2.re1.yahoo.com [216.115.108.29]
11 349 ms 661 ms * ge-8-3.bas-a1.re4.yahoo.com [216.39.49.1]
12 348 ms 351 ms 351 ms w2.rc.vip.re4.yahoo.com [206.190.60.37]

Trace complete.


DiffServ: No valid DiffServ equivalent (000010)
Why there is no valid Diff... ? what i have to do to get the best of my connection? :confused:

Thx! :)

trogers
08-17-08, 11:02 PM
IP ToS: 00001000 (8)

Set Default ToS Value to 80 and not 8

Uneven ping times at the modem in hop 2. Relocate the modem to some place else so that you get all 3 ping times down to 10ms or 11ms.

pokemon17007
08-21-08, 04:22 AM
We changed modem because the one before was broken.
New MTU value is now not so good.

« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 08.21.2008 05:19
IP address: 117.4.xxx.xxx

TCP options string: 0204055001010402
MSS: 1360
MTU: 1400
TCP Window: 65280 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 0
Unscaled RWIN : 65280
Reccomended RWINs: 65280, 130560, 261120, 522240
BDP limit (200ms): 2611kbps (326KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1044kbps (131KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 45
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00010000 (16)
Precedence: 000 (routine)
Delay: 1 (low delay)
Throughput: 0 (normal throughput)
Reliability: 0 (normal reliability)
Cost: 0 (normal cost)
Check bit: 0 (correct)
DiffServ: No valid DiffServ equivalent (000100)


IP ToS: 00010000 (16)
default ToS value still 16 although i set it in TCPoptimized 80 !? How to fix it?
Thx!

pokemon17007
08-22-08, 03:04 AM
I think they change the modem. MTU back to 1492. Good!

However, Default ToS Value can't be fixed to 80 !?
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 08.22.2008 03:59
IP address: 117.4.xxx.xx

TCP options string: 020405ac01010402
MSS: 1452
MTU: 1492
TCP Window: 65340 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 0
Unscaled RWIN : 65340
Reccomended RWINs: 63888, 127776, 255552, 511104
BDP limit (200ms): 2614kbps (327KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1045kbps (131KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 45
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00010000 (16)
Precedence: 000 (routine)
Delay: 1 (low delay)
Throughput: 0 (normal throughput)
Reliability: 0 (normal reliability)
Cost: 0 (normal cost)
Check bit: 0 (correct)
DiffServ: No valid DiffServ equivalent (000100)

Why? Any help?

Rollingstone
08-22-08, 03:25 AM
default ToS value still 16 although i set it in TCPoptimized 80 !? How to fix it?

You cannot ! It depends on your ISP !

TCP Window: 65340 (multiple of MSS)

Your MTU is now 1492, TCP Window should be 63888.

pokemon17007
08-22-08, 07:45 AM
You cannot ! It depends on your ISP !

Your MTU is now 1492, TCP Window should be 63888.
Oh! Now i know!

I changed TCP Windows side !

Thx! :thumb:

pokemon17007
09-05-08, 10:07 PM
I found that some driver of mine are out of date, include the ethernet driver.

Is it necessary to upgrade driver?

Will i get better net speed with newer version of the ethernet driver?
:confused:
I think i can get answer from you! :thumb:

Thx!

trogers
09-05-08, 11:21 PM
Is it necessary to upgrade driver?

Will i get better net speed with newer version of the ethernet driver?


Generally yes, it is better to upgrade to the latest driver on the assumption that the later driver was made to address some weakness in the older one.

But do be careful when updating drivers for signal devices. Some drivers are only meant for particular countries or regions, and not to be used in other regions. This would be highlighted by the makers' websites. Always make a backup of the old driver in case you need to revert to it.

pokemon17007
09-06-08, 03:46 AM
Generally yes, it is better to upgrade to the latest driver on the assumption that the later driver was made to address some weakness in the older one.

But do be careful when updating drivers for signal devices. Some drivers are only meant for particular countries or regions, and not to be used in other regions. This would be highlighted by the makers' websites. Always make a backup of the old driver in case you need to revert to it.
Thx for your help!

I'm using Driver Genius for upgrade drivers, but it cannot download new one.

Can you help to download driver? It's Realtek RLT8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet NIC.

i have tried to find it on internet, but i don't know which one fits mine. :rolleyes:

Thx!

trogers
09-06-08, 08:24 PM
Thx for your help!

I'm using Driver Genius for upgrade drivers, but it cannot download new one.

Can you help to download driver? It's Realtek RLT8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet NIC.

i have tried to find it on internet, but i don't know which one fits mine. :rolleyes:

Thx!

http://www.soft32.com/download_185728.html

pokemon17007
09-07-08, 10:32 AM
http://www.soft32.com/download_185728.html
Thx for help!

I found that driver on realtek website. and i have installed it successful.