dnash
01-03-08, 08:35 AM
I am working with an ASA running 8.x and a Cisco VPN client running
4.6.03.0021. The client connects fine (passes phase 1 and phase2 and
traffic flows downstream of the ASA which I have sniffed. It appears
as though the traffic it not returned to the client as all sessions
timeout.
I have other clients using this same profile without issue. It
appears
that the clients having the problem all have the following in common:
Physical NIC
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.2.1
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
Cisco Systems VPN Adapter
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 172.16.1.25
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.240
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 172.16.1.25
You will notice that the Cisco VPN Adapter is given an IP Address and
Mask from the ASA via a configured address pool, but you will notice
that virtual adapter is using the same IP address for its interface
and gateway.
I have other Cisco VPN client running version 3.6.x and 5.x that do
not have this issue. I ruled out the common issues NAT-T, MTU, etc.
I was hoping some one could confirm or deny whether this IP
addressing
issue may be the culprit and whether this is a known issue for this
version of the client. My search of Cisco Bugtraq show no.
Reply Reply to author Forward
4.6.03.0021. The client connects fine (passes phase 1 and phase2 and
traffic flows downstream of the ASA which I have sniffed. It appears
as though the traffic it not returned to the client as all sessions
timeout.
I have other clients using this same profile without issue. It
appears
that the clients having the problem all have the following in common:
Physical NIC
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.2.1
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
Cisco Systems VPN Adapter
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 172.16.1.25
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.240
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 172.16.1.25
You will notice that the Cisco VPN Adapter is given an IP Address and
Mask from the ASA via a configured address pool, but you will notice
that virtual adapter is using the same IP address for its interface
and gateway.
I have other Cisco VPN client running version 3.6.x and 5.x that do
not have this issue. I ruled out the common issues NAT-T, MTU, etc.
I was hoping some one could confirm or deny whether this IP
addressing
issue may be the culprit and whether this is a known issue for this
version of the client. My search of Cisco Bugtraq show no.
Reply Reply to author Forward