Can you try to explain this?

[mwkirchner]

I went and looked at the team folding page and I am curious about why some people show more WU but actually have lower scores. Here is a small section that I saw on there:

130 mwkirchner 42.36 / 5
131 the_snake_ 42.16 / 6
132 onetrueday 41.74 / 10
133 Bouncer 39.13 / 7
134 JugHead 30 / 24
135 Jorge 29.96 / 7
136 steverattray 28.55 / 6
137 Zedan 28.18 / 7
138 p2ii 26.2 / 18
139 Russell 26.09 / 14
140 cy 25 / 5
141 ColdFusion_SG 24.66 / 18
142 ElDiablo 24.07 / 4

First number is score and second is WU

[downhill]

Earlier work uints were smaller and as such, counted for fewer points.

A lot of them were under a point each.

[mwkirchner]

Thank you Downhill ...

[downhill]

Originally posted by mwkirchner
Thank you Downhill ...

:)

Your welcome!

[btracy]

Especially the older WU's. The larger point WU's are much newer than the .6 point ones. :)

[goobee]

Seems almost unfair doesn't it. :( A lot of people worked hard for their .6's.

[Encnuk]

Supposedly, the .6 WU's should have taken a lot less time than the current ones, that is why they created the idea of score and not just counting WU's, so that a real measure of a persons output can be achieved.